dc.contributor.author |
Bastable, Kirsty
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Cooke, Paul
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Harvey, Lou
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Olarte, Victoria
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Zimmerman, Jodi
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Dada, Shakila
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2024-02-19T12:54:35Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2024-02-19T12:54:35Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2023-01 |
|
dc.description |
SUPPLEMENETARY MATERIALS : TABLE S1: Inclusion and exclusion criteria of the scoping review, p. 1; TABLE S2: Program goals, content, outcomes, stakeholder involvement and evaluation, pp. 2–43; TABLE S3: Conceptual foundations of programs, pp. 44–46. |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
Globally vulnerable populations are negatively impacted by policy and practice. For
vulnerable youth, risks to growth, development, and a lack of participation in decisions about their
lives are common. Leadership programs are frequently implemented to address the risks faced by
vulnerable youth. This review sought to describe the goals, content, and outcomes of existing youth
development programs to better understand if they are meeting the needs of vulnerable youth. A
scoping review was conducted using the PRISMA-ScR methodology. Ten electronic databases and
grey literature were searched. A total of 89 youth development programs were identified. The goals,
content, and outcomes of the programs were thematically analyzed. Four foci emerged, namely, youth,
relationship, community, and social justice-focused development. A youth focus was most commonly
represented, and the social justice focus was the least represented. Most programs addressed only
one focus area. If youth development programs are to provide youth with both the skills to engage
with and opportunities to change their circumstances, then all four focus areas need to be included.
Secondly, a need for the active involvement of youth in both the planning and implementation of
programs was identified. Finally, safeguarding needs to be highlighted in any program working with
vulnerable youth. |
en_US |
dc.description.department |
Centre for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (CAAC) |
en_US |
dc.description.librarian |
am2024 |
en_US |
dc.description.sdg |
None |
en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship |
GCRF grant and Hope and Homes for Children. |
en_US |
dc.description.uri |
https://www.mdpi.com/journal/socsci |
en_US |
dc.identifier.citation |
Bastable, Kirsty, Paul
Cooke, Lou Harvey, Victoria Olarte,
Jodi Zimmerman, and Shakila Dada.
2023. How Are Leadership Programs
Empowering Our Vulnerable
Children and Youth? A Scoping
Review. Social Sciences 12: 2.
https://DOI.org/10.3390/socsci12010002. |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
2076-0760 |
|
dc.identifier.other |
10.3390/socsci12010002 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/94727 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
MDPI |
en_US |
dc.rights |
© 2022 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license. |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Vulnerable children and youth |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Development programs |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Stakeholder involvement |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Downward accountability |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Empowerment |
en_US |
dc.title |
How are leadership programs empowering our vulnerable children and youth? A scoping review |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |