JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
| dc.contributor.advisor | Bosman, Hendrina | |
| dc.contributor.postgraduate | Coetzer, Ruan | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-02-16T07:48:01Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-02-16T07:48:01Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2024-04 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023-09-30 | |
| dc.description | Dissertation (MA (Linguistics))--University of Pretoria, 2023. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Afrikaans: Die kognitiewe linguistiek voer aan dat meeste abstrakte konsepte slegs in terme van metafore bedink en verstaan kan word. Dekolonialiteit as abstrakte konsep is steeds ’n vurige besprekingspunt in die konteks van hoër onderwys in Suid-Afrika. Hierdie verhandeling beoog om die verband tussen metaforiese uitdrukkings en die konseptualisering van kolonialisme, kolonialiteit en dekolonisering te ondersoek deur die Konseptuele Metafoorteorie (KMT) te benut. Die verhandeling is spesifiek toegespits op die akademiese diskoers oor dekolonisering in Suid-Afrika, waar 87 artikels uit verskeie databasisse as die korpus vir die studie dien. Daar word gefokus op die identifisering van metafore in hierdie diskoers, die rol van metafore in die konseptualisering van die genoemde konsepte, asook die invloed van hierdie metafore op ons persepsie en benadering tot die diskoers. Daar word veral staatgemaak op die metafoorteorie van George Lakoff (1993), Mark Johnson (1987), Lakoff en Johnson (1980, 1999), Zoltan Kövecses (1997, 2010) en Joseph Grady. Verder word beginsels uit die kritiese diskoersanalise betrek, na aanleiding van Michel Foucault (2002), Jonathan Charteris-Black (2004) en Alice Deignan (2005). Die studie beoog om insigte te verkry in die rol van metafore in die akademiese diskoers oor dekolonisering en om die verband tussen taal, samelewing en denke verder te verken. Daar word aangevoer dat LEWENDE ENTITEIT, FISIESE VOORWERP, KONFLIK, FISIESE KRAG, FISIESE STRUKTUUR, en RUIMTELIKE VERHOUDINGS die sentrale domeine vir metafoorkartering uit die korpus vergestalt. Kolonialisme word metafories hoofsaaklik as ’n lewende entiteit uitgedruk; kolonialiteit as ’n komplekse struktuur en dekolonisering as die beweging tussen ruimtes. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | English: Cognitive linguistics argues that most abstract concepts can only be conceived and understood in terms of metaphors. Decoloniality, as an abstract concept, remains a fervent point of discussion within the context of higher education in South Africa. This dissertation aims to investigate the relationship between metaphorical expressions and the conceptualisation of colonialism, coloniality, and decolonisation using Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT). The dissertation specifically focuses on the academic discourse surrounding decolonization in South Africa, utilizing a corpus of 87 articles from various databases. The study concentrates on identifying metaphors within this discourse, determining the role of metaphors in conceptualizing the mentioned concepts, and exploring the influence of these metaphors on our perception and approach to the discourse. Emphasis is placed on the metaphor theory of George Lakoff (1993), Mark Johnson (1987), Lakoff and Johnson (1980, 1999), Zoltan Kövecses (1997, 2010), and Joseph Grady. Additionally, principles from critical discourse analysis are incorporated, drawing from Michel Foucault (2002), Jonathan Charteris-Black (2004), and Alice Deignan (2005). The study aims to gain insights into the role of metaphors in the academic discourse on decolonisation and further explore the connection between language, society, and thought. It is argued that LIVING ENTITY, PHYSICAL OBJECT, CONFLICT, PHYSICAL FORCE, PHYSICAL STRUCTURE, and SPATIAL RELATIONS are the central domains for metaphorical mapping in the corpus. Colonialism is metaphorically expressed primarily as a living entity; coloniality as a complex structure, and decolonisation as movement between spaces. | en_US |
| dc.description.availability | Unrestricted | en_US |
| dc.description.degree | MA (Linguistics) | en_US |
| dc.description.department | Afrikaans | en_US |
| dc.description.faculty | Faculty of Humanities | en_US |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Andrew W. Mellon Foundation | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | BRONNELYS Allbritton, D.W et al. 1996. Reliability of prosodic cues for resolving syntactic ambiguity. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 22(3): 714. Aristotle. 2013. Poetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. America, C. & Le Grange, L. 2019. Decolonising the curriculum: Contextualising economics and business studies teaching. Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe. 59(1): 106-124. Aston, G. & Lou, B. 1998. The BNC Handbook: Exploring the British National Corpus with SARA. Edinburgh University Press. Baker, P et al. 2006. A glossary of corpus linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Beeman, M., 1998. Coarse semantic coding and discourse comprehension. Right hemisphere language comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience. 255-284. Bergen, B. 2007. Experimental methods for simulation semantics. In Gonzalez-Marquez et al. (Eds.). Methods in cognitive linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Bergen, B. & Chan, T.T.. 2005. Writing direction influences spatial cognition. In Proceedings of the annual meeting of the cognitive science society. 27(27). Berkeley FrameNet. 2002. FrameNet: A Frame Semantic Resource. University of California, Berkeley: International Computer Science Institute. Aanlyn beskikbaar op: https://framenet.icsi.berkeley.edu/ (Soos op 30 November 2022) Biber, D. 1988. Variation Across Speech and Writing. New York: Cambridge University Press. Black, M. 1955. Metaphor. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 55 (1954-1955) 273-294. Black, M. 1962. Metaphor. In Margolis, J. (ed.). Philosophy Looks at the Arts. New York: Temple University Press. 218–35. Bosman, N. & Pienaar, M. Afrikaanse semantiek. In: Carstens, W.A.M. & Bosman, N. (eds.) 2014. Kontemporêre Afrikaanse Taalkunde. Pretoria: Van Schaik. Bosman, N. 2015. EET en DRINK in Afrikaans–’n leksikaal–semantiese ondersoek’. Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe. 36(1): 123-145. Bowdle, B. F. & Gentner, D. 2005. The career of metaphor. Psychological Review, 112: 193-216. Brown, T.L. 2020. Social metaphors in cellular and molecular biology. In: Beger, A. & Smith, T.H. 2020. How metaphors guide, teach and popularize science. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 1-37. Brugman, C. 1990. What is the invariance hypothesis?. De Gruyter Mouton: 257-268. Bussmann, H. 1996. Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics. London: Routledge. Calvo, P. & Gomila, T. 2008. Directions for an embodied cognitive science: toward an integrated approach. In Calvo, P. & Gomila, T. (eds.). 2008. Handbook of Cognitive Science: An Embodied Approach. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Cameron, L. 2003. Metaphor in educational discourse. London: Continuum. Cameron, L. 2007. Confrontation or complementarity? Metaphor in language use and cognitive metaphor theory. Annual Review of cognitive linguistics. 5(1): 107-135. Carmen, M. 2016. A defence of Wiredu’s project of conceptual decolonisation. South African Journal of Philosophy, 35(2): 235-248. Carstens, W.A.M. 1997. Afrikaanse tekslinguistiek. Pretoria: J.L. van Schaik. Carstens, W.A.M. & Raidt, E.H. 2017. Die storie van Afrikaans: Uit Europa en van Afrika – Biografie van ’n taal. Pretoria: Protea Boekhuis. Charteris-Black, J. 2004. Critical metaphor analysis. In: Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis: 243-253. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. Charteris-Black, J. 2005. Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. Chilton, P. 2005. Missing links in mainstream CDA: modules, blends and the critical instinct. In Wodak, R. & Chilton, P. (eds.). A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis (19-52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Chilton, P. 1985. Language and the nuclear arms debate: Nukespeak today. London: F. Pinter. Chilton, P. 1987. Metaphor, euphemism and the militarization of language. Current research on peace and violence. 10(1): 7-19. Chilton, P. 1996. Security metaphors: Cold war discourse from containment to common house (Vol. 2). New York: Peter Lang Pub Incorporated. Cicourel, A.V. 1975. Discourse and text: Cognitive and linguistic processes in studies of social structure. Versus, 12(2): 33-84. Cienki, A. 2007. Frames, Idealised Cognitive Models, and Domains (170-187). In: Geeraerts, D. & Cuyckens, H. (reds.). 2007. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxord: Oxford University Press. Clausner, T.C. & Croft, W. 1999. Domains and image schemas. Cognitive Linguistics. 10(1): 1-31. Cluver, A.D. de V. 1978. Die terminologie. Diploma in vertaling. Pretoria : UNISA: 67-131. Costandius, E. et al. 2018. # FeesMustFall and decolonising the curriculum: Stellenbosch University students’ and lecturers’ reactions. South African Journal of Higher Education. 32(2): 65-85. Coulson, S. and Oakley, T. 2005. Blending and Coded Meaning: Literal and figurative meaning in cognitive semantics. Journal of Pragmatics. 37(10): 1510-1536. Croft, W. & Cruse, D.A. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge University Press. Damasio A.R. 1994. Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Putnam. Dancygier, B. & Sweetser, E. 2014. Figurative language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Deignan, A. 1999. Corpus-based research into metaphor. In Lynne Cameron andGraham Low (eds.). Researching and Applying Metaphor. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 177-199. Derrida, J. 1998 [1967]. Of Grammatology. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University. Deignan, A. 2005. Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Dirven, R. 2002. Metonymy and metaphor: Different mental strategies of conceptualization. In: In Dirven, R. & Porings, R. (eds.). Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter: 407–434. Dirven, R. & Verspoor, M. 2004. Cognitive Exploration of Language and Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. B.V. Dladla, N. 2012. Decolonising the University in South Africa: A precondition for Liberation. Peace and Security for African Development. 160-174. Drewer, P. 2003. Die kognitive Metapher als Werkzeug des Denkens. Zur Rolle der Analogie bei der Gewinnung und Vermittlung wissenschaftlicher Erkenntnisse (Forum für Fachsprachenforschung). Zeitschrift für Rezensionen zur germanistischen Sprachwissenschaft. 1(2): 187-191. Du Preez, E. 2009. Metafoor in die vertaalde mediadiskoers oor aandele en markte in Finweek. Universiteit van die Vrystaat: Bloemfontein. Eskridge, T. & Shelley, C., 2009. A naturalistic exploration of forms and functions of analogizing. Metaphor and Symbol. 24(3): 125-154. Evans, V. 2009. How words mean: lexical concepts, cognitive models, and meaning construction. Oxford University Press on Demand. Evans, V. & Green, M. 2006. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University. Evans, V. et al (eds.). 2007. The Cognitive Linguistics Reader. Equinox: London. Eze, C. 2015. Decolonisation and its discontents: Thoughts on the postcolonial African moral self. South African Journal of Philosophy. 34(4): 408-418. Fauconnier, G. 1985. Mental Spaces. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. Fauconnier, G. 1997. Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M. 2002. The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities. New York: Basic books. Fairclough, N. 1992. Discourse and text: Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. Discourse & society. 3(2): 193-217. Fairclough, N. 2001. Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research. Methods of critical discourse analysis. 5(11): 121-138. Fauconnier, G., 1997. Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge University Press. Fanon, Franz. 1967. Black Skin, White Masks (vertaal deur Charles Lam Markmann). New York: Grove Press. Fanon, F. 2017. The Wretched of the Earth (vertaal deur Richar Philcox). Cape Town: Kwela Books. Feldman, J.A. 2006. From Molecule to Metaphor: A Neural Theory of Language. MIT Press: Cambridge. Feldman, J.A. & Narayanan, S. 2004. Embodied meaning in a neural theory of language. Brain and Language. 89: 385–92. Fillmore, C.J. 1968. The case for case. In Bach, E. & Harms, R.T. 1968. Universals in Linguistic Theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston: 1-88. Fillmore, C., 1985. Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di semantica. (6): 222-254. Fillmore, C.J. 2006[1982]. Frame semantics. In: Geeraerts, D. (ed.) 2006. Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings. New York: Mouton de Gruyter: 373-400. Fodor, J.A. & Pylyshyn, Z.W. 1988. Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. Cognition. 28(1-2): 3-71. Foucault, M. 2002[1972]. The Archeology of Knowledge. New York: Routledge. Francis, W., Kučera, H. & Mackie, A.W. 1982. Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Gallese, V. and Lakoff, G. 2005. The brain's concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive neuropsychology. 22(3-4): 455-479. Gentner, D. & Jeziorski, M. 1993. The shift from metaphor to analogy in Western science. Metaphor and thought. 447. Garagnani, M. & Pulvermüller, F. 2016. Conceptual grounding of language in action and perception: a neurocomputational model of the emergence of category specificity and semantic hubs. European Journal of Neuroscience. 43:721-737. Garside, R. & Smith, N. 1997. A Hybrid Grammatical Tagger: CLAWS 4. In: Garside, R., Leech, G. & McEnery, A. (eds.). Corpus Annotation: Linguistic Information from Computer Text Corpora: 102- 121. London: Longman. Gee, J.P. & Hanford, M. 2012. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Routledge: New York. Geeraerts, D. & Grondelaers, S. 1995. Looking back at anger: Cultural traditions and metaphorical patterns. In Taylor, J.R. & MacLaury, R.E. (eds.). Language and the cognitive construal of the world. 153–179. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Geeraerts, D. 2010. Theories of lexical semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Geeraerts, D & Cuyckes, H. 2007. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Geeraerts, D. (ed.) 2006. Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Gibbs, R.W. 1992. Categorization and metaphor understanding. Psychological Review 99: 572–77. Gibbs, R.W. 1996. Why many concepts are metaphorical. Cognition. 61: 309-319. Gibbs, R.W. et al. 2004. Metaphor is grounded in embodied experience. Journal of Pragmatics. 36: 1189-1210. Giora, R., 2002. Literal vs. figurative language: Different or equal? Journal of pragmatics/ 34(4): 487-506. Giora, R., 2003. On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Glucksberg, S. & Keysar, B. 1990. Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological review. 97(1): 3. Goatly, A. 2007. Washing the brain: Metaphor and hidden ideology. New York: John Benjamins Publishing. Goede, H. 2007. A new methodology approaching metaphorical language in science Metaphor and its moorings: studies in the grounding of metaphorical meaning. Koers: Bulletin for Christian Scholarship= Koers: Bulletin vir Christelike Wetenskap. 72(4): 728-730. Goschler, J. 2019. Metaphors in educational texts: A case study on history and chemistry teaching material. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association. 7(1): 79-92. Grady, J. E. 2005. Images schemas and perception: Redefining a definition. In: Hampe, B. (eds.) 2005. From Perception to Meaning: Images Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter Grady, J.E. 1998. Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphor and primary scenes. Verhandeling, University of California: Berkeley. Grady, J. Oakley, T. and Coulson, S., 1999. Blending and metaphor. Amsterdam Studies In The Theory And History Of Linguistic Science Series 4, pp.101-124 Grosfoguel, R. 2007. The Epistemic Decolonial Turn: Beyond Political-Economy Paradigms . Cultural studies. 21(2-3): 211-223. Gruber, J. S. 1965. Studies in lexical relations. Doktorale proefskrif: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Hampe, B. (eds.) 2005. From Perception to Meaning: Images Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Harder, P. 2010. Meaning in mind and society: A functional contribution to the social turn in cognitive linguistics (41). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Harris, R. & Taylor, T.J. 1989. Landmarks in Linguistic Thought: The Western Tradition from Socrates to Saussure. London: Routledge. Harris, R. A. 1993. The Linguistic Wars. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hart, C. 2007. Critical Discourse Analysis and Metaphor: Toward a Theoretical Framework. Critical Discourse Studies. Haser, V. 2005. Metaphor, Metonymy, and Experientialist Philosophy: Challenging Cognitive Semantics. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Heleta, S. 2016. Decolonisation of higher education: Dismantling epistemic violence and Eurocentrism in South Africa. Transformation in Higher Education. 1(1): 1-8. Hiraga, M.K. 1991. “Metaphor and comparative cultures.” In: Fendos, P.G. (red), Cross-cultural communication: East and west (vol. III). Taiwan: T’ai Ch’eng Publishing in Tainan, 149-166. Imre, A. 2012. Space in Cognitive Linguistics. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica. 4(2) : 247-260. Jackendoff, R. 2002. Foundations of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Jäkel, O. 1999. Kant, Blumenberg, Weinrich: Some forgotten contributions to the cognitive theory of metaphor. Amsterdam Studies In The Theory And History Of Linguistic Science Series. (4): 9-28. Janse, T. & Redeker, G. 1999. Cognitive Linguistics: Foundations, Scope, and Methodology. Cognitive Linguistics Research. Jansen, J. (red.) 2019. Decolonisation in universities: The politics of knowledge. Johannesburg: Wits University Press. Jiang, C. & Yang, K. 2021. Concepts and Conceptualisation. In: Wen, X. & Taylor, J.R. (eds.) 2021. The Routledge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. New York: Routledge: 255-268. Johnson, M. 1987. The Body in the Mind. Chicago. The University of Chicago Press. Johnson, M. 2017. Embodied Mind, Meaning, and Reason: How our bodies give rise to understanding. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Jones, Peter. 1999. Cognitive linguistics and the Marxist approach to ideology. In: Dirven, R., Hawkins, B. & Sandikcioglu, E. (eds.). 1999. Language and Ideology Volume I: Theoretical cognitive approaches. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company: 227-251. Jung-Beeman, M. 2005. Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language. Trends in cognitive sciences. 9(11): 512-518. Kay, P. & McDaniel, C.K. 1978. The linguistic significance of the meanings of basic color terms. Language. 54(3): 610-646. Kiverstein, J. & Miller, M. 2015. The embodied brain: towards a radical embodied cognitive neuroscience. Frontiers in human neuroscience. 9: 237. Knight, J. 2018. Decolonizing and transforming the Geography undergraduate curriculum in South Africa. South African Geographical Journal= Suid-Afrikaanse Geografiese Tydskrif. 100(3): 271-290. Koller, V. 2004. Businesswomen and war metaphors: possessive, jealous and pugnacious? Journal of Sociolinguistics 8(1):3-22. Koopman, O. and Koopman, K.J. 2018. A curriculum of inclusivity: towards a “lived-body” and “lived-experience” curriculum in South Africa. Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology. 18(2): 1-12. Kövecses, Z. 1997. Metaphor: Does it constitute or reflect cultural models? In Gibbs, R.W. & Steen, G.J. (eds.). 1997. Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 167-188. Kovecses, Z. 2002. Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kövecses, Z. 2008. Conceptual metaphor theory: Some criticisms and alternative proposals. Annual review of cognitive linguistics. 6(1):168-184. Kövecses, Z. 2010. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kövecses, Z. 2020. Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Krennmayr, T. 2011. Metaphor in newspapers. Tesis: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Kaunda, C.J. 2016. The wilderness wanderings: A theo-liminal pedagogy for mind decolonisation in African Christianity. Acta Theologica. 36(1): 52-69. Kytö, M. 1996. Manual to the Diachronic Part of the Helsinki Corpus of English Texts: Coding Conventions and Lists of Source Texts. Department of English: University of Helsinki. Kuhn, W. 1993. Metaphors create theories for users. In European Conference on Spatial Information Theory. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg: 366-376. Kumalo, S.H. 2018. Explicating abjection – Historically white universities creating natives of nowhere?. Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning. 6(1): 1-17. Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Lakoff, G. 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In: Evans, W. et al (eds.) 2007. The Cognitive Linguistics Reader. London: Equinox Publishing. Lakoff, G. 1996. Moral Politics: What conservatives know that liberals don’t. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Lakoff, G. 2008. The political mind: why you can't understand 21st-century politics with an 18th-century brain. London: Penguin. Lakoff, G. 2009. Metaphor and war: The metaphor system used to justify war in the Gulf. Peace Research. 25-32. Lakoff, G. 2014. Mapping the brain’s metaphorical circuitry: metaphorical thought in everyday reason. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 8(958). DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00958. Lakoff, G. Espenson, J. & Schwartz. 1991. The Master Metaphor List. 2nd ed. Berkley: University of California, Berkley. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied mind and its challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books. Lakoff, G. & Turner, M. 2009. More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Langacker, R.W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical prerequisites (Vol. 1). Stanford: Stanford University Press. Langacker, R.W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical prerequisites (Vol. 2). Stanford: Stanford University Press. Langacker, R.W. 2007. Constructing the meanings of personal pronouns. In: Radden, G., Siemund, P. & Berg, T. 2007. Aspects of meaning construction. Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing Company: 171-187. Langacker, R.W., 2012. Essentials of cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Larson, B. 2011. Metaphors for environmental sustainability: Redefining our relationship with nature. New Haven: Yale University Press. Le Grange, L. 2018. “The notion of Ubuntu and the (post)humanist condition.” In : Petrovic, J. & Mitchell, R. 2018. Indigenous philosophies of education around the world, 40‒60. New York: Routledge. Le Grange, L. 2019. “The curriculum case for decolonization.” In: Jansen, J.D. 2019. The politics of curriculum: Making sense of decolonization in universities, 17‒35. Johannesburg: Wits University Press. Littlemore, J. et al 2011. Difficulties in metaphor comprehension faced by international students whose first language is not English. Applied linguistics. 32(4): 408-429. Lönneker-Rodman, B. 2008. The Hamburg Metaphor Database project: issues in resource creation. Language Resources and Evaluation. 42: 293-318. Mabela, L. et al. 2020. Language and discourse in contemporary South African politics: a critical discourse analysis. Language Matters: Studies in the Languages of Southern Africa. 51(3): 108-129. MacCormac, E. 1985. A Cognitive Theory of Metaphor. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Mácha, J. 2019. Metaphor in Analytic Philosophy and Cognitive Science. Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 75 (4): 2247-2286. Malan, S. 2008. Conceptual metaphors in South African political speeches (1994–2001). Stellenbosch papers in Linguistics. 38: 73-106. Mbembe, A. 2016. Decolonising the university: New directions. Arts & Humanities in Higher Education, 15(1): 29-45. Mgqwashu, E. 2016. Universities can’t decolonise the curriculum without defining it first. The Conversation. 22:1-4. Michael, R. (ed.). 2007. Macmillan English Dictionary for Advanced Learners. 2nd edition. Oxford: Macmillan Education. MacWhinney, B. 2000. The CHILDES project: The database (Vol. 2). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Association Publishers. Malan, S. 2008. Conceptual metaphors in South African political speeches. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics. 38: 73-106. Maalej, Z. 2007. Doing Critical Discourse Analysis with the Contemporary Theory of Metaphor: Towards a discourse model of metaphor. In: Hart, C. & Lukeš, D. 2007. Cognitive Linguistics in Critical Discourse Analysis: Application and Theory. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Mashal, N. et al. 2015. Hemespheric involvement in native and non-native comprehension of conventional metaphors. Journal of Neurolinguistics. 35: 96-108. Maldanado-Torres, N. 2007. On Coloniality of Being: Contributions to the Development of a Concept. Cultural Studies. 21(2-3): 240-270. Mashibini, S. 2019. Student voices on decolonising the curriculum: a study of two departments at the University of the Witwatersrand. Verhandeling: Universiteit van die Witwatersrand. Mbembe, A. 2016. Decolonising the university: New directions. Arts & Humanities in Higher Education, 15(1): 29-45. Meyer, C. F. 2002. English corpus linguistics: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Mignolo, W.D. 2000. Local Histories / Global Designs: Essays on the Coloniality of Power, Subaltern Knowledge and Border Thinking. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Mignolo, W.D. 2011. The Darker Side of Modernity: Global Futures, Decolonial Options. Durham: Duke University Press. Mignolo, W. D. 2018. Decoloniality and Phenomenology: The Geopolitics of Knowing and Epistemic/Ontological Colonial Differences. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy. 32(3): 360-387. Pretoria: Fanele. Modiri, J. 2020. The aporias of ‘decolonisation’ in the South African academy. In: Talla, J. & Motala, S. (reds.). From Ivory Towers to Ebony Towers: Transforming Humanities Curricula in South Africa, Africa and African-American Studies. Jacana Media. Musolff, A. 2011. Migration, media and ‘deliberate’ metaphors. Metaphorik.de. 21: 7-19. Narayanan, S.S. 1997. Knowledge-based Action Representations for Metaphor and Aspect (KARMA). Tesis: Universiteit van Kalifornië, Berkeley. Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S.J. 2015. Decoloniality as the future of Africa. History Compass. 13(10): 485–496. Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S.J. 2019. Discourses of Decolonization/Decoloniality. Papers on Language and Literature. 55(3) 201-226. Nerlich, B. and &, D.D., 2007. Cognitive linguistics and the history of linguistics. In: Geeraerts, D & Cuyckes, H. 2007. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 589-610. Nietzsche, F.W. 2004 [1873]. On Truth and Lying in an Extra-moral Sense. In Rivkin, J. & Ryan, M. 2004. Literary Theory: An Anthology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. 262-265. Nothnagel, I. 2009. Conceptual Metaphors in Media Discourses on AIDS Denialism in South Africa. Magister verhandeling: Stellenbosch University. Nuyts, J. 2007. Cognitive Linguistics and Functional Linguistics. In: Geeraerts, D & Cuyckes, H. 2007. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 543-565. Oakley, T. 2007. IN: Geeraerts, D. & Cuyckens, C. 2007. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Oelofsen, R. 2015. Decolonisation of the African mind and intellectual landscape. Phrominon. 16(2): 130-146. Ortony, A. (ed.) 1993. Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pike, K. 1954. Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of Human Behavior I-III. Summer Institute of Linguistics. Pulvermüller, F. 2012. Meaning and the brain: The neurosemantics of referential, interactive, and combinatorial knowledge. Journal of Neurolinguistics. 25(5); 423-459. Radden, G. 2002. How metonymic are metaphors? In Dirven, R. & Porings, R. (eds.). Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter: 407–434. Rescorla, M. 2019. The Computational Theory of Mind. In: Zalta, E.N. (red.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Aanlyn beskikbaar by: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/computational-mind/#ArgForCon (Soos op 28 Maart 2019). Richards, I.A. 1936. The Philosophy of Rhetoric. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Rigney, D. 2001. The metaphorical society: An invitation to social theory. Toronto: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Robins, R.H. 1997. A short history of linguistics. London: Longman. Said, E.W. 1978. Orientalism. Londen: Penguin Books. Schnitzer, M.L. & Pedreira, M.A. 2005. A neuropsychological theory of metaphor. Language Sciences. 27: 31-49. Shen, Y. & Balaban, N. 1999. Metaphor (In)Coherence in Discourse. Discourse Processes. 28(2): 139-153. Spivak, G. C. 1988. Can the Subaltern Speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. 271–313. Illinois: University of Illinois Press. Spivak, G.C. 1998. Translator’s Preface. In Derrida, J. 1998. Of Grammatology. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University. Schnitzer, M.L. & Pedreira, M.A. 2005. A neuropsychological theory of metaphor. Language Sciences, 27(1): 31-49. Simpson, J. & Weiner, E.S.C. 2009. Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Sinclair, J. 1991. Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Smith, M.R. 2007. Levels of Metaphor in Persuasive Legal Writing. Mercer Law Review. 58: 919-947. Steen, G. et al. 2010. A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Stefanowitsch, A. 2006. The function of metaphor: Developing a corpus-based perspective. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics. 10(2): 161-198. Straehle, C. et al. 1999. Struggle as metaphor in European Union discourses on unemployment. Discourse & Society. 10(1): 67-99. Summers, D. 2009. The Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English, 4th ed. Harlow: Longman. Talmy, L. 1972. Semantic Structures in English and Atsugewi. Doktorale proefskrif: Universiteit van Kalifornië. Talmy, L. 1988. Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive science, 12(1): 49-100. Talmy, L. 1996. The windowing of attention in language. Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning. Oxord: Oxford University Press. Talmy, L. 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge: MIT Press. Thagard, P. 2019. Cognitive Science. In: Zalta, E.N. (red.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Aanlyn beskikbaar by: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/cognitive-science/>. (Soos op 20 Oktober 2019). Thibodeau, P.H. & Boroditsky, L. 2011. Metaphors We Think With: The Role of Metaphor in Reasoning. PLoS One. 6(2): 1-11. Thompson, E. 2016. Foreword. In: Verela, F.J., Thompson, E. & Rosch, E. (eds.) 2017. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge: MIT Press. Turner, M. 2002. The cognitive study of art, language, and literature. Poetics today: 23(1), p.9-20. Van der Merwe, L. 2021. ‘n Verkenning van multimodale metafore in die poësiefilm Stad in die mis (Opperman). Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe. 61(4): 1020-1038. Van Dijk, T.A. 1975. Action, action description, and narrative. New literary history. 6(2): 273-294. Van Dijk, T.A. 1993. Elite discourse and racism. London: SAGE Publications.van Van Dijk, T.A. 1995a. Aims of Critical Discourse Analysis. Japanese Discourse, 1: 17-27. Van Dijk, T.A. 1995b. Discourse semantics and ideology. Discourse & society. 6(2): 243-289. Van Dijk, T.A. 2008. Discourse and racism. A companion to racial and ethnic studies: 145-159. Van Dijk, T.A. 2009. News, discourse, and ideology. The handbook of journalism studies. 191-204. Van Huyssteen, G.B. 1995. ’n Kognitief-pragmatiese perspektief op seksuele uitdrukkings in Afrikaans. MA-Verhandeling: Universiteit van Pretoria. Venter, H.E. 2009. Die verhouding tussen verhaal en metafoor in Agaat (Marlene van Niekerk). Magister verhandeling: Noordwes-Universiteit. Verela, F.J., Thompson, E. & Rosch, E. (eds.) 2017. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge: MIT Press. Vervaeke, J. & Kennedy, J.M. 2004. Conceptual metaphor and abstract thought. Metaphor and symbol. 19(3): 213-231. Walton, E. & Lloyd, G. 2011. An analysis of metaphors used for inclusive education in South Africa. Acta Academica, 43(3): 1-31. Wa Thiong'o, N. 1987. Decolonising the Mind: The Politics of Language in African Literature. Harare: Zimbabwe Publishing House. Zheng, M. 2017. A Conceptual Metaphor Account of Word Composition: Potentiality of" light" in English and Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.other | A2024 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/94680 | |
| dc.language.iso | Afrikaans | en_US |
| dc.publisher | University of Pretoria | |
| dc.rights | © 2023 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. | |
| dc.subject | UCTD | en_US |
| dc.subject | Dekolonialiteit | en_US |
| dc.subject | Kognitiewe semantiek | en_US |
| dc.subject | Diskoersanalise | en_US |
| dc.subject | Korpuslinguistiek | en_US |
| dc.subject | Konseptuele Metafoorteorie | en_US |
| dc.subject | Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) | |
| dc.subject.other | SDG-15: Life on land | |
| dc.subject.other | Humanities theses SDG-15 | |
| dc.title | In ruimtes vasgekeer: 'n Kognitiewe benadering tot metafore in dekoloniale diskoers | en_US |
| dc.type | Dissertation | en_US |
