South African physiotherapists’ attitudes to medicine prescription as an extension of practice

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kakono, Tsungirirai V.
dc.contributor.author Mathye, Desmond
dc.contributor.author Brand, Sarel Jacobus
dc.contributor.author Cordier, Werner
dc.date.accessioned 2024-02-15T09:17:12Z
dc.date.available 2024-02-15T09:17:12Z
dc.date.issued 2023-06-23
dc.description DATA AVAILABILITY : Raw data are available upon request as unedited SPSS data files, including outputs generated from the corresponding author, W.C. en_US
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND : The extension of medicine prescription rights to other healthcare providers was proposed to reduce pharmacotherapeutic service delivery challenges in the South African healthcare sector. The scope of practice of physiotherapists is being reviewed to possibly include prescription rights to promote service delivery. OBJECTIVES : Our study assessed the attitudes of registered South African physiotherapists to the inclusion of prescription rights in their scope of practice, including enablers and challenges, and the drug classes they believe to be most relevant. METHOD : A cross-sectional descriptive survey of South African registered physiotherapists was completed using an online questionnaire. RESULTS : A total of 359 participants completed the questionnaire, where 88.2% agreed that prescribing rights should be introduced, and 87.64% would want to be trained to prescribe. Participants identified several benefits: improved service delivery (91.3%); reduced healthcare delivery costs (89.8%); decreased need for multiple healthcare practitioner consultations (93.2%). Concerns included: inadequate training (55%); increased workload (18.7%); increased insurance premiums against medical liability claims (46.2%). Drugs of relevance included analgesics (95.6%) and bronchodilators (96.0%), while low preference was placed on drugs unrelated to physiotherapy. Chi-square analysis revealed associations between specific drug classes and fields of expertise. CONCLUSION : South African physiotherapists agree that prescribing and a limited formulary would benefit their scope of practice; however, educational concerns are evident. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS : Findings support the drive to extend the South African physiotherapy scope of practice, however, investigation will be needed to determine the most appropriate way to capacitate future physiotherapists and current graduates should the extension be approved. en_US
dc.description.department Pharmacology en_US
dc.description.department Physiotherapy en_US
dc.description.librarian am2024 en_US
dc.description.sdg None en_US
dc.description.uri http://www.sajp.co.za en_US
dc.identifier.citation Kakono, T.V., Mathye, D., Brand, S.J. & Cordier, W., 2023, ‘South African physiotherapists’ attitudes to medicine prescription as an extension of practice’, South African Journal of Physiotherapy 79(1), a1851. https://DOI.org/10.4102/sajp.v79i1.1851. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0379-6175 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 2410-8219 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.4102/sajp.v79i1.1851
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/94634
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher AOSIS Open Journals en_US
dc.rights © 2023. The Authors. Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License. en_US
dc.subject Attitudes en_US
dc.subject Extended scope of practice en_US
dc.subject Non-medical prescribing en_US
dc.subject Physiotherapy en_US
dc.subject Service delivery en_US
dc.title South African physiotherapists’ attitudes to medicine prescription as an extension of practice en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record