dc.contributor.advisor |
Henwood, Roland David |
|
dc.contributor.postgraduate |
Botha, Luné |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2024-02-12T07:43:28Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2024-02-12T07:43:28Z |
|
dc.date.created |
2024-04 |
|
dc.date.issued |
2023-09 |
|
dc.description |
Dissertation (MA (International Relations))--University of Pretoria, 2023. |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
This qualitative study questions what patterns of multilateral vaccine diplomacy were practised by states to adapt to the challenge of Covid-19 from August 2020 to July 2022. The vaccine diplomacy practises of China, Russia, India, the UK, and the USA within the multilateral domain are analysed through secondary data analysis. These states were selected since literature demonstrates that they are key players in the Covid-19 vaccine manufacturing and production process; they provided a significant amount of Covid-19 vaccine donations and played leading roles in the geopolitical system during Covid-19. The study is further guided by a conceptual framework that touches on the concepts of foreign policy, soft power, diplomacy, global health diplomacy, vaccine nationalism, vaccine diplomacy and multilateralism. The study shows that these nations have adopted a dual-method strategy in vaccine diplomacy—bilaterally and multilaterally—to realise their national interests. These interests are not solely confined to immediate health and immunisation goals but also extend to strategically secure future advantages, such as enhancing their influence or bolstering diplomatic ties within specific regions such as Africa and the East Asia Pacific. This study is significant for practitioners and scholars since it analyses the most significant “givers and receivers” of vaccine diplomacy that sheds light on our current geopolitical context, multilateral state alliances and the intentions behind vaccine diplomacy. |
en_US |
dc.description.availability |
Unrestricted |
en_US |
dc.description.degree |
MA (International Relations) |
en_US |
dc.description.department |
Political Sciences |
en_US |
dc.description.faculty |
Faculty of Humanities |
en_US |
dc.description.sdg |
SDG-03: Good health and well-being |
en_US |
dc.identifier.citation |
* |
en_US |
dc.identifier.doi |
https://doi.org/10.25403/UPresearchdata.25119077 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.other |
A2024 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/94445 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
University of Pretoria |
|
dc.rights |
© 2023 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. |
|
dc.subject |
UCTD |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Multilateral vaccine diplomacy |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Vaccine diplomacy |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Vaccine science diplomacy |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Multilateral vaccine science diplomacy |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Covid-19 |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Covid-19 vaccine development |
en_US |
dc.subject |
vaccine donations |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Vaccine donation givers and receivers |
en_US |
dc.subject |
China |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Russia |
en_US |
dc.subject |
India |
en_US |
dc.subject |
United Kingdom |
en_US |
dc.subject |
United States of America |
en_US |
dc.subject |
SDG-03: Good health and well-being |
|
dc.subject |
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) |
|
dc.subject.other |
SDG-03: Good health and well-being |
|
dc.subject.other |
Humanities theses SDG-03 |
|
dc.title |
Multilateralism and vaccine diplomacy : an analysis of Covid-19 practises from August 2020 to July 2022 |
en_US |
dc.type |
Dissertation |
en_US |