An in vitro, SEM and micro-CT comparison of dentinal tubule penetration and void formation by four bioceramic sealers in premolars

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Arnold, Samantha
dc.contributor.coadvisor Buchanan, Glynn Dale
dc.contributor.postgraduate Shabalala, Lotive
dc.date.accessioned 2024-02-02T09:17:02Z
dc.date.available 2024-02-02T09:17:02Z
dc.date.created 2024-04
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.description Dissertation (MSc (Dentistry))--University of Pretoria, 2023. en_US
dc.description.abstract Introduction: Bioceramic sealers are receiving substantial attention because of their favourable physicobiological properties. Studies have shown that the use of materials containing calcium-silicates results in the formation of a crystalline structure similar to tooth and bone apatite, which is favourable in the healing of endodontic lesions. Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the sealing ability of four bioceramic sealer materials, available commercially in South Africa, by measuring the formation of voids at three levels (coronal, middle and apical). Materials and Methods: In this study, four different bioceramic sealers (BioRoot RCS, CeraSeal, TotalFill, and AH Plus Bioceramic [BC]) were compared. Single rooted premolars were included. Coronectomies were performed on each tooth and the root canals were prepared using reciprocating instruments. The canal was then obturated using a single gutta-percha point and one of the four specified root canal sealers. The sealers were allowed to set, after which the obturations were analysed and compared using microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) to evaluate void formation. Results: For the overall average of all three positions (coronal, middle, and apical), the mean surface area of voids of the four sealers did not differ significantly (p>0.05). The overall median surface area of voids for AH Plus BC and BioRoot differed significantly (p=0.049). Conclusion: None of the four tested bioceramic sealers demonstrated void-free fillings and voids were found in all samples to varying degrees. en_US
dc.description.availability Unrestricted en_US
dc.description.degree MSc (Dentistry) en_US
dc.description.department Odontology en_US
dc.description.faculty Faculty of Health Sciences en_US
dc.description.sdg None en_US
dc.identifier.citation * en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.25403/UPresearchdata.25003031 en_US
dc.identifier.other A2024 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/94251
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher University of Pretoria
dc.rights © 2023 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
dc.subject UCTD en_US
dc.subject Bioceramic en_US
dc.subject Calcium silicate en_US
dc.subject Dentin tubules en_US
dc.subject Penetrability en_US
dc.subject Void formation en_US
dc.title An in vitro, SEM and micro-CT comparison of dentinal tubule penetration and void formation by four bioceramic sealers in premolars en_US
dc.type Dissertation en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record