Examining PIRLS 2021 : differential item functioning across English and isiZulu language groups

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Roux, Karen
dc.contributor.coadvisor Mihai, Maryke
dc.contributor.postgraduate Mthimkhulu, Sinethemba
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-14T10:22:21Z
dc.date.available 2023-12-14T10:22:21Z
dc.date.created 2024-05
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.description Dissertation (MEd (Assessment and Quality Assurance))--University of Pretoria, 2023. en_US
dc.description.abstract In today's interconnected and rapidly evolving world, reading literacy stands as a fundamental skill that empowers individuals to thrive intellectually, socially and economically. This study aimed to shed light on the factors that might have a bearing in reading literacy, with a specific focus on isiZulu, using insights derived from the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) data. The PIRLS trend assessments have revealed that South Africa is experiencing a ‘reading crisis’ in that all South African Grade 4 learners’ achievement falls below the International Benchmark. This study investigated measurement invariance as a possible factor that might have contributed to the difference in learner achievement in isiZulu when compared with English scores. IsiZulu learners came across words such as “i-Hammerhead shark” in the PIRLS achievement booklets that could not be translated into isiZulu by professional translators. It is challenging to expect Grade 4 learners to comprehend and answer items derived from these words if they are difficult to translate or unavailable in isiZulu. To ascertain equivalence, item difficulty was examined to ascertain whether the level of difficulty was the same for the two groups. Functional equivalence was examined to ascertain the behaviour of the items in the two groups. Using Rasch Measurement Theory (RMT), Differential Item Functioning (DIF) was conducted to determine biases towards the learners who completed the PIRLS 2021 assessment in isiZulu. Descriptive statistics revealed that there is a significant difference between the English and isiZulu mean scores. Raw scores and Rasch Analysis displayed some items in the passage lacked metric and functional equivalence. en_US
dc.description.availability Unrestricted en_US
dc.description.degree MEd (Assessment and Quality Assurance) en_US
dc.description.department Science, Mathematics and Technology Education en_US
dc.description.faculty Faculty of Education en_US
dc.description.sdg SDG-04: Quality Education en_US
dc.identifier.citation * en_US
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.25403/UPresearchdata.24784086 en_US
dc.identifier.other A2024 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/93787
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher University of Pretoria
dc.rights © 2023 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
dc.subject Differential item functioning en_US
dc.subject Equivalence en_US
dc.subject Measurement invariance en_US
dc.subject PIRLS 2021 en_US
dc.subject Reading literacy en_US
dc.subject Secondary analysis en_US
dc.subject Validity en_US
dc.subject UCTD
dc.subject.other SDG-04: Quality education
dc.subject.other Sustainable development goals (SDGs)
dc.subject.other Education theses SDG-04
dc.subject.other SDG-10: Reduced inequalities
dc.subject.other Education theses SDG-10
dc.title Examining PIRLS 2021 : differential item functioning across English and isiZulu language groups en_US
dc.type Dissertation en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record