Revisiting a flux recovery systematic error arising from common deconvolution methods used in aperture-synthesis imaging

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Radcliffe, Jack Frederick
dc.contributor.author Beswick, R.J.
dc.contributor.author Thomson, A.P.
dc.contributor.author Njeri, A.
dc.contributor.author Muxlow, T.W.B.
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-05T10:57:46Z
dc.date.available 2023-12-05T10:57:46Z
dc.date.issued 2024-01
dc.description DATA AVAILABILITY : The data underlying this article will be shared upon reasonable request to the corresponding author. en_US
dc.description.abstract The point-spread function (PSF) is a fundamental property of any astronomical instrument. In interferometers, differing array configurations combined with their uv coverage, and various weighting schemes can produce an irregular but deterministic PSF. As a result, the PSF is often deconvolved using CLEAN-style algorithms to improve image fidelity. In this paper, we revisit a significant effect that causes the flux densities measured with any interferometer to be systematically offset from the true values. Using a suite of carefully controlled simulations, we show that the systematic offset originates from a mismatch in the units of the image produced by these CLEAN-style algorithms. We illustrate that this systematic error can be significant, ranging from a few to tens of per cent. Accounting for this effect is important for current and future interferometric arrays, such as MeerKAT, LOFAR, and the SKA, whose core-dominated configuration naturally causes an irregular PSF. We show that this offset is independent of other systematics, and can worsen due to some factors such as the goodness of the fit to the PSF, the deconvolution depth, and the signal-to-noise ratio of the source. Finally, we present several methods that can reduce this effect to just a few per cent. en_US
dc.description.department Physics en_US
dc.description.librarian hj2023 en_US
dc.description.sdg None en_US
dc.description.sponsorship The Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics, which is funded by the STFC; the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme; the RADIOBLOCKS project will receive funding from the European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation programme; the Development in Africa with Radio Astronomy (DARA) project funded by STFC. 𝑒-MERLIN. en_US
dc.description.uri https://academic.oup.com/mnras en_US
dc.identifier.citation Radcliffe, J.F., Beswick, R.J., Thomson, A.P. et al. 2024, 'Revisiting a flux recovery systematic error arising from common deconvolution methods used in aperture-synthesis imaging', Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 527, no. 1, pp. 942-949, doi : 10.1093/mnras/stad2694. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0035-8711 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 1365-2966 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1093/mnras/stad2694
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/93749
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Oxford University Press en_US
dc.rights © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Astronomical Society. en_US
dc.subject Point-spread function (PSF) en_US
dc.subject Data analysis en_US
dc.subject Techniques en_US
dc.subject Interferometric, photometric – methods en_US
dc.title Revisiting a flux recovery systematic error arising from common deconvolution methods used in aperture-synthesis imaging en_US
dc.type Postprint Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record