Abstract:
BACKGROUND : Placental insufficiency negatively impacts fetal growth and body composition (BC), potentially affecting lifelong health. Placental insufficiency, detectable as an abnormal umbilical artery resistance index (UmA-RI) on Doppler ultrasonography, is highly prevalent in otherwise healthy South African pregnant women. Appropriate intervention reduces stillbirth and perinatal death, but research on long-term outcomes of surviving infants is lacking.
OBJECTIVES : This study aimed to describe and compare anthropometry and BC during the first 2 y of life in a cohort of term-born infants with normal and abnormal prenatal UmA-RI.
METHODS : Term-born infants (n = 81; n = 55 normal, n = 26 abnormal UmA-RI on third trimester Doppler screening) were followed up at 8-time points until age 2 y. Anthropometric measurements were taken, and FFM and FM were assessed by deuterium dilution. Age- and sex-specific z-scores were calculated for anthropometric indices, FM, FFM, FM index (FMI), and FFM index (FFMI) using appropriate reference data. Anthropometry and BC of infants with normal and abnormal UmA-RI were compared using an independent t-test or Mann–Whitney test.
RESULTS : At most ages, group mean z-scores were <0 for length-for-age and FM and >0 for weight-for-length and FFM. Compared with infants with normal UmA-RI, infants with abnormal UmA-RI had significantly lower weight-for-age z-scores at birth (−0.77 ± 0.75 compared with −0.30 ± 1.10, P = 0.026), ages 10 wk to 9 mo (−0.4 ± 0.87 to −0.2 ± 1.12 compared with 0.3 ± 0.85 to 0.6 ± 1.09; P = 0.007–0.017) and 18 mo (−0.6 ± 0.82 compared with 0.1 ± 1.18; P = 0.037); length-for-age z-scores at ages ≤14 wk (−1.3 ± 1.25 to −0.9 ± 0.87 compared with −0.2 ± 1.04 to −0.1 ± 1.00; P = 0.004–0.021); and FFM-for-age z-scores at ages ≤9 mo (−0.1 ± 0.82 to 0.7 ± 0.71 compared with 0.7 ± 1.00 to 1.3 ± 0.85; P = 0.002–0.028). FFMI, percentage FFM, FM, percentage FM, and FMI showed no consistent significant differences.
CONCLUSIONS : Infants with abnormal UmA-RI had lower weight-for-age and length-for-age z-scores, particularly at younger ages, with proportionally lower FFM but no consistent differences in percentage FFM and FFMI. These findings merit further investigation in larger cohorts.