dc.contributor.author |
Haught, John F.
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2023-10-09T06:24:33Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2023-10-09T06:24:33Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2023-05 |
|
dc.description |
This research is part of The research project ‘Understanding Reality (Theology and Nature)’, directed by Prof. Johan Buitendag, Department of Systematic and Historical Theology, Faculty of Theology and Religion, University of Pretoria. |
en_US |
dc.description |
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT : Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analysed in this study. |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
Has Darwinian science made natural theology obsolete, as many Christian scholars now believe? In this article, the author assumes that natural theology does not take place in a religious vacuum but instead borrows its sense of god from this or that specific faith tradition. Its task is not to arrive at an understanding of the divine mystery different from that of systematic or doctrinal theology. As the author shall argue here, however, the empirical grounding essential to natural theology must be considerably more comprehensive and more profound than that provided by the natural sciences, mainly because the latter usually leave out any mention of the most striking of all natural phenomena – the human mind and its mysterious operations. The author maintains that an exclusively Darwinian narrative cannot fully explain why your mind is restless for truth or why you should trust your mind. The point of natural theology is to ask whether nature as a whole is intelligible apart from the reality of God. The author’s point is that an empirical survey of nature that restricts itself to following the modern scientific method’s habitual exclusion of thought from its survey of nature cannot succeed in making nature intelligible. |
en_US |
dc.description.department |
Dogmatics and Christian Ethics |
en_US |
dc.description.uri |
http://www.hts.org.za |
en_US |
dc.identifier.citation |
Haught, J.F., 2023, ‘Natural theology after Darwin’, HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 79(2), a8481. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v79i2.8481. |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
0259-9422 (print) |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
2072-8050 (online) |
|
dc.identifier.other |
10.4102/hts.v79i2.8481 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/92755 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
AOSIS |
en_US |
dc.rights |
© 2023. The Authors. Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License. |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Evolution |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Darwin |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Einstein |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Lonergan |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Natural theology |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Intelligent subjectivity |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Human thought |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Wider empiricism |
en_US |
dc.title |
Natural theology after Darwin |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |