Assessing the insurmountable challenge in proving the existence of a customary marriage in terms of section 3(1)(b) of the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act 120 of 1998 and the misplacing of gender inequality

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Radebe, Martha Keneilwe
dc.date.accessioned 2023-08-04T11:21:05Z
dc.date.available 2023-08-04T11:21:05Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.description.abstract The Recognition of Customary Marriages Act 120 of 1998 endeavoured, amongst other things, to alleviate the discriminatory and unequal treatment suffered by women in customary marriages. Women had grounds for celebration when the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act was finally enacted. The onus of proving the existence of a customary marriage still remains an insurmountable challenge and poses a threat of distorting African customs when courts attempt to ascertain the existence of a customary marriage. This challenge is reflected in the cases of Tsambo v Sengadi (244/19) [2020] ZASCA 46 (30 April 2020). Sengadi v Tsambo; In Re: Tsambo (40344/2018) [2018] ZAGPJHC 666; [2019] 1 All SA 569 (GJ) (8 November 2018). On 28 February 2016, Ms Sengadi and Mr Tsambo together with their families celebrated what was assumed to be a customary marriage. The Tsambo family furthermore on the abovementioned day welcomed Ms Sengadi as their bride and this according to the Sengadi family signified a handing over resulting in the conclusion of a valid customary marriage. The Tsambo family has however in the cases of Sengadi v Tsambo, and Tsambo v Sengadi, disputed the existence of a customary marriage and raised the argument that Ms Sengadi was not handed over to the Tsambo family in accordance with Setswana custom. Ms Sengadi now bears the onus to prove the existence of a valid customary marriage and this exposes the insurmountable challenge in establishing and ascertaining applicable contents of African custom. This paper seeks to assess the challenge in ascertaining the existence of a valid customary marriage and how African custom can be misplaced under the guise of gender equality with emphasis on how the handing over of the bride has been misplaced by courts in the Sengadi v Tsambo and Tsambo v Sengadi cases. en_US
dc.description.department Public Law en_US
dc.description.librarian am2023 en_US
dc.description.uri https://www.dejure.up.ac.za en_US
dc.identifier.citation Radebe, K.M. ‘Assessing the insurmountable challenge in proving the existence of a customary marriage in terms of section 3(1)(b) of the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act 120 of 1998 and the misplacing of gender inequality’ 2022 De Jure Law Journal 77-86 http://dx.DOI.org/10.17159/2225-7160/2022/v55a5. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1466-3597 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 2225-7160 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.17159/2225-7160/2022/v55a5
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/91804
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Pretoria University Law Press en_US
dc.rights This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. en_US
dc.subject Customary marriage en_US
dc.subject Tsambo family en_US
dc.subject Setswana custom en_US
dc.subject African custom en_US
dc.subject Gender inequality en_US
dc.subject SDG-10: Reduced inequalities en_US
dc.subject SDG-16: Peace, justice and strong institutions en_US
dc.title Assessing the insurmountable challenge in proving the existence of a customary marriage in terms of section 3(1)(b) of the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act 120 of 1998 and the misplacing of gender inequality en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record