Estimates of carnivore densities in a human-dominated agricultural matrix in South Africa

We are excited to announce that the repository will soon undergo an upgrade, featuring a new look and feel along with several enhanced features to improve your experience. Please be on the lookout for further updates and announcements regarding the launch date. We appreciate your support and look forward to unveiling the improved platform soon.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Faure, J. Philip B.
dc.contributor.author Swanepoel, Lourens H.
dc.contributor.author Cilliers, Deon
dc.contributor.author Venter, Jan A.
dc.contributor.author Hill, Russell A.
dc.date.accessioned 2023-07-14T11:34:35Z
dc.date.available 2023-07-14T11:34:35Z
dc.date.issued 2022-09
dc.description.abstract Populations of carnivore species outside protected areas may be of considerable importance for conservation, as many protected areas do not provide sufficient space for viable populations. Data on carnivore population sizes and trends are often biased towards protected areas, and few studies have examined the role of unprotected areas for carnivore conservation. We used camera-trapping data and spatial capture–recapture models to estimate population densities for four sympatric carnivores: the African leopard Panthera pardus, spotted hyaena Crocuta crocuta, brown hyaena Parahyaena brunnea and African civet Civettictis civetta in Platjan, a predominantly agricultural, mixed land-use system, South Africa. Mean densities per 100 km2 for the leopard were 2.20 (95% CI 1.32–3.68) and 2.18 (95% CI 1.32–3.61) for left and right flank data, respectively; spotted hyaena, 0.22 (95% CI 0.06–0.81); brown hyaena, 0.74 (95% CI 0.30–1.88); and African civet 3.60 (95% CI 2.34–5.57; left flanks) and 3.71 (95% CI 2.41–5.72; right flanks). Our results indicate that although densities are lower than those reported for protected areas, humans and predators coexist in this unprotected agricultural matrix. We suggest that increased conservation effort should be focused in such areas, to mitigate human–carnivore conflicts. Our study improves the knowledge available for carnivore populations on privately owned, unprotected land, and may benefit conservation planning. en_US
dc.description.department Mammal Research Institute en_US
dc.description.librarian hj2023 en_US
dc.description.uri https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/oryx en_US
dc.identifier.citation Faure, J., Swanepoel, L., Cilliers, D., Venter, J., & Hill, R. (2022). Estimates of carnivore densities in a human-dominated agricultural matrix in South Africa. Oryx, 56(5), 774-781. doi: 10.1017/S003060532100034X. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0030-6053 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 1365-3008 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1017/S003060532100034X
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/91460
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Cambridge University Press en_US
dc.rights © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence. en_US
dc.subject Agricultural area en_US
dc.subject Camera trapping en_US
dc.subject African civet (Civettictis civetta) en_US
dc.subject Human–wildlife conflict en_US
dc.subject African leopard (Panthera pardus) en_US
dc.subject Spotted hyaena (Crocuta crocuta) en_US
dc.subject Brown hyaena (Parahyaena brunnea) en_US
dc.subject Spatial capture–recapture en_US
dc.subject South Africa (SA) en_US
dc.subject SDG-15: Life on land en_US
dc.title Estimates of carnivore densities in a human-dominated agricultural matrix in South Africa en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record