Psychometric properties, measurement invariance, and construct validity of the subjective career success inventory

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Olckers, Chantal
dc.contributor.author Koekemoer, Eileen
dc.date.accessioned 2023-06-05T09:22:45Z
dc.date.available 2023-06-05T09:22:45Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.description DATA AVAILABITY STATEMENT : Data is available upon request from the authors. en_US
dc.description.abstract With the increased scholarly interest in career success measurements, this study investigated the construct validity and measurement invariance of the Subjective Career Success Inventory. A sample of 736 South African employees participated in the study. Latent variable modelling was performed to estimate and sequentially compare several independent cluster models of confirmatory factor analysis (ICM-CFA) (i.e., unidimensional, first-factor, second-factor, and bifactor models). The results supported the construct validity for an eight-dimensional construct with acceptable convergent and discriminant validity. We found measurement invariance across gender. Task performance was related to the eight subjective career success dimensions, providing evidence of nomological validity. KEY POINTS : WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS TOPIC : (1) The Subjective Career Success Inventory (SCSI) is increasingly being used to measure subjective career success, but studies reporting comprehensive psychometric properties for the SCSI are scarce. (2) Literature indicates various factorial permutations for the instrument, and limited validation studies have been conducted on the SCSI. (3) Although scholars have argued gender gaps in the experiences of career success, a thorough investigation of the SCSI has not been done to corroborate such differences. WHAT THIS TOPIC ADDS : (1) The eight-factor structure of the SCSI was confirmed within the South African context. (2) The SCSI demonstrated invariance between males and females. (3) Task performance was related to the eight SCSI dimensions, providing evidence of nomological validity. en_US
dc.description.department Human Resource Management en_US
dc.description.librarian hj2023 en_US
dc.description.uri https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/raup20 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Chantal Olckers & Eileen Koekemoer (2022) Psychometric properties, measurement invariance, and construct validity of the subjective career success inventory, Australian Journal of Psychology, 74:1, 2121177, DOI: 10.1080/00049530.2022.2121177. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0004-9530 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 1742-9536 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1080/00049530.2022.2121177
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/91022
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Taylor and Francis en_US
dc.rights © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. en_US
dc.subject Bifactor confirmatory factor analyses en_US
dc.subject Construct validity en_US
dc.subject Gender en_US
dc.subject Measurement invariance en_US
dc.subject Subjective career success en_US
dc.subject SDG-05: Gender equality en_US
dc.subject SDG-08: Decent work and economic growth en_US
dc.title Psychometric properties, measurement invariance, and construct validity of the subjective career success inventory en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record