Ambient air pollution on the Highveld : an airshed at a watershed moment?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Wernecke, Bianca
dc.contributor.author Langerman, Kristy E.
dc.contributor.author Garland, Rebecca M.
dc.contributor.author Feig, Gregor Timothy
dc.date.accessioned 2023-05-10T12:51:05Z
dc.date.available 2023-05-10T12:51:05Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.description.abstract On 18 March 2022, the Pretoria High Court found that chronic air pollution is a violation of Section 24 of the South African Constitution, and that South Africans have a right to an environment that is not harmful to their health and well-being (CER, 2022). This “has important implications for communities forced to live with the debilitating effects of air pollution on the Mpumalanga Highveld, and more broadly for constitutional jurisprudence and government accountability” (CER, 2022). Since 2019, two environmental justice groups, groundWork and the Vukani Environmental Justice Movement, represented by the Centre for Environmental Rights (CER), sought recourse from the High Court on the high air pollution levels in the Highveld Priority Area (HPA). The basis of this “Deadly Air” Case was a declaration that “the poor air quality in the Highveld Priority Area is a breach of the residents’ right to an environment that is not harmful to their health and wellbeing” (CER, 2022). The HPA is known for its poor air quality. Numerous studies have reported widespread non-compliance with the PM and O3, as well as NOx and SO2 National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) (Steyn and Kornelius 2018; Feig et al., 2019; Chindhindi et al., 2019; Morosele and Langerman 2020). There are a range of air pollution sources which contribute to the poor air quality in the HPA, including industry, roads, vehicles, mining, power generation, biomass burning, wind-blown dust, domestic fuel use practices and waste burning, to name a few (Ross et al., 2007; Nkosi et al., 2018; Walton et al., 2021). The negative impacts of the air pollution are felt by many who reside on the Highveld and even beyond. Much pressure has been placed on government by civil society and legal experts to improve the air quality in the region, leading to many difficult discussions. Consequently, over the past years, the air quality in the airshed has become the focus of many air pollution-related research studies, legal debates and media releases. en_US
dc.description.department Geography, Geoinformatics and Meteorology en_US
dc.description.librarian am2023 en_US
dc.description.uri http://www.cleanairjournal.org.za en_US
dc.identifier.citation Wernecke, B., Langerman, K.E., GArland, R.M. et al. 2022, 'Ambient air pollution on the Highveld : an airshed at a watershed moment?', Clean Air Journal, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 1-3, doi : 10.17159/caj/2022/32/1.14070. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2410-972X
dc.identifier.other 10.17159/caj/2022/32/1.14070
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/90621
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher National Association for Clean Air en_US
dc.rights © 2022. The Author(s). Published under a 1 Creative Commons Attribution Licence. en_US
dc.subject Constitution en_US
dc.subject Pretoria High Court en_US
dc.subject Right to an environment en_US
dc.subject Health en_US
dc.subject Chronic air pollution en_US
dc.subject Air pollution en_US
dc.subject Well-being en_US
dc.title Ambient air pollution on the Highveld : an airshed at a watershed moment? en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record