Acute respiratory illness and return to sport : a systematic review and meta-analysis by a subgroup of the IOC consensus on 'acute respiratory illness in the athlete'

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Snyders, Carolette
dc.contributor.author Pyne, David B.
dc.contributor.author Sewry, Nicola Ann
dc.contributor.author Hull, James H.
dc.contributor.author Kaulback, Kelly
dc.contributor.author Schwellnus, Martin Peter
dc.date.accessioned 2023-03-07T11:04:52Z
dc.date.available 2023-03-07T11:04:52Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.description.abstract OBJECTIVE : To determine the days until return to sport (RTS) after acute respiratory illness (ARill), frequency of time loss after ARill resulting in >1 day lost from training/competition, and symptom duration (days) of ARill in athletes. DESIGN : Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES : PubMed, EBSCOhost, Web of Science, January 1990–July 2020. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA : Original research articles published in English on athletes/military recruits (15–65 years) with symptoms/diagnosis of an ARill and reporting any of the following: days until RTS after ARill, frequency (%) of time loss >1 day after ARill or symptom duration (days) of ARill. RESULTS : 767 articles were identified; 54 were included (n=31 065 athletes). 4 studies reported days until RTS (range: 0–8.5 days). Frequency (%) of time loss >1 day after ARill was 20.4% (95% CI 15.3% to 25.4%). The mean symptom duration for all ARill was 7.1 days (95% CI 6.2 to 8.0). Results were similar between subgroups: pathological classification (acute respiratory infection (ARinf) vs undiagnosed ARill), anatomical classification (upper vs general ARill) or diagnostic method of ARinf (symptoms, physical examination, special investigations identifying pathogens). CONCLUSIONS : In 80% of ARill in athletes, no days were lost from training/competition. The mean duration of ARill symptoms in athletes was 7 days. Outcomes were not influenced by pathological or anatomical classification of ARill, or in ARinf diagnosed by various methods. Current data are limited, and future studies with standardised approaches to definitions, diagnostic methods and classifications of ARill are needed to obtain detailed clinical, laboratory and specific pathogen data to inform RTS. en_US
dc.description.department Physiology en_US
dc.description.department Sports Medicine en_US
dc.description.librarian hj2023 en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Partially supported by funding from the IOC Research Centre of South Africa. en_US
dc.description.uri http://bjsm.bmj.com en_US
dc.identifier.citation Snyders, C., Pyne, D.B., Sewry, N., et al. 'Acute respiratory illness and return to sport: a systematic review and meta-analysis by a subgroup of the IOC consensus on ‘acute respiratory illness in the athlete’ British Journal of Sports Medicine 2022; 56: 223-232, doi : 10.1136/bjsports-2021-104719. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0306-3674 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 1473-0480 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1136/bjsports-2021-104719
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/90009
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher BMJ Publishing Group en_US
dc.rights © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. en_US
dc.subject Return to sport (RTS) en_US
dc.subject Acute respiratory illness (ARill) en_US
dc.subject Athletes en_US
dc.title Acute respiratory illness and return to sport : a systematic review and meta-analysis by a subgroup of the IOC consensus on 'acute respiratory illness in the athlete' en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record