Selecting a public service delivery assessment tool for South Africa : an application of the AHP method

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ajayi, O.
dc.contributor.author De Vries, Marne
dc.date.accessioned 2023-02-22T09:09:55Z
dc.date.available 2023-02-22T09:09:55Z
dc.date.issued 2022-05-06
dc.description.abstract Many service delivery performance assessment (SDPA) tools exist globally that address the need to measure actual performance against pre-defined standards and to take corrective action to improve service delivery. The purpose of this paper is to guide the selection of the most appropriate SDPA tool for South Africa. Given the overwhelming civic unrest linked to public service performance levels, a solution is needed urgently. This study therefore presents a scientific approach to the process of deciding on a shortlist of off-the-shelf solutions, based on the criteria of effectiveness, project, and technical, so that a decision on the most appropriate tool for South Africa can be made on the basis of the synthesised results and a sensitivity analysis. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is used, and the performance journey mapping (PJM) tool has been selected on the basis of criteria and sub-criteria that were also validated for their practicality. en_US
dc.description.abstract Baie diensleweringsprestasie-evaluering (SDPA)-instrumente bestaan wêreldwyd wat die behoefte aanspreek om werklike prestasie teen voorafbepaalde standaarde te meet en om regstellende stappe te neem om dienslewering te verbeter. Die doel van hierdie artikel is om die keuse van die mees geskikte SDPA-instrument vir Suid-Afrika te lei. Gegewe die oorweldigende burgerlike onrus gekoppel aan staatsdiensprestasievlakke, is 'n oplossing dringend nodig. Hierdie studie bied dus 'n wetenskaplike benadering tot die proses om te besluit op 'n kortlys van kommersieel beskikbare oplossings, gebaseer op die kriteria van doeltreffendheid, projek en tegnies, sodat 'n besluit oor die mees geskikte hulpmiddel vir Suid-Afrika geneem kan word op grond van die gesintetiseerde resultate en 'n sensitiwiteitsanalise. Die analitiese hiërargieproses (AHP) word gebruik, en die prestasiereiskartering-instrument (PJM) is gekies op grond van kriteria en subkriteria wat ook vir hul praktiese toepassing bekragtig is. en_US
dc.description.department Industrial and Systems Engineering en_US
dc.description.librarian am2023 en_US
dc.description.uri http://sajie.journals.ac.za en_US
dc.identifier.citation Ajayi, O. & De Vries, M. 2022, 'Selecting a public service delivery assessment tool for South Africa : an application of the AHP method', South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 139-153, doi : 10.7166/33-1-2547. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1012-277X (print)
dc.identifier.issn 2224-7890 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.7166/33-1-2547
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/89756
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Southern African Institute for Industrial Engineering en_US
dc.rights © 2022 Oluyomi Ajayi, Marne De Vries. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License. en_US
dc.subject Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) en_US
dc.subject Analitiese hiërargieproses (AHP) en_US
dc.subject Public service delivery en_US
dc.subject Performance assessment en_US
dc.subject Multi-criteria decision making en_US
dc.subject South Africa (SA) en_US
dc.subject Suid-Afrika (SA) en_US
dc.subject Service delivery performance assessment (SDPA) en_US
dc.subject Diensleweringsprestasie-evaluering en_US
dc.subject Prestasiereiskartering-instrument en_US
dc.subject Performance journey mapping (PJM) en_US
dc.title Selecting a public service delivery assessment tool for South Africa : an application of the AHP method en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record