Experimental infection of domestic pigs (Sus scrofa) with Rift Valley fever virus

Lubisi, Baratang Alison; Mutowembwa, Paidamwoyo Barry; Ndouvhada, Phumudzo Nomicia; Odendaal, Lieza; Bastos, Armanda; Penrith, Mary-Louise

UPSpace Home
→
Veterinary Science
→
Veterinary Tropical Diseases
→
Research Articles (Veterinary Tropical Diseases)
→
View Item

Experimental infection of domestic pigs (Sus scrofa) with Rift Valley fever virus

Lubisi, Baratang Alison; Mutowembwa, Paidamwoyo Barry; Ndouvhada, Phumudzo Nomicia; Odendaal, Lieza; Bastos, Armanda; Penrith, Mary-Louise

URI: https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/89630

Date: 2023-02

Abstract:

Rift valley fever (RVF), caused by the RVF virus (RVFV), is a vector-borne zoonotic disease that primarily affects domestic ruminants. Abortion storms and neonatal deaths characterise the disease in animals. Humans develop flu-like symptoms, which can progress to severe disease. The susceptibility of domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus) to RVFV remains unresolved due to conflicting experimental infection results. To address this, we infected two groups of pregnant sows, neonates and weaners, each with a different RVFV isolate, and a third group of weaners with a mixture of the two viruses. Serum, blood and oral, nasal and rectal swabs were collected periodically, and two neonates and a weaner from group 1 and 2 euthanised from 2 days post infection (DPI), with necropsy and histopathology specimens collected. Sera and organ pools, blood and oronasorectal swabs were tested for RVFV antibodies and RNA. Results confirmed that pigs can be experimentally infected with RVFV, although subclinically, and that pregnant sows can abort following infection. Presence of viral RNA in oronasorectal swab pools on 28 DPI suggest that pigs may shed RVFV for at least one month. It is concluded that precautions should be applied when handling pig body fluids and carcasses during RVF outbreaks.

Description:

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT : Publicly available sequence datasets were analysed in this study. The datasets can be found online [69,70]. The sequences generated in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. They will be publicly available following article publication.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS : FIGURE S1: Schematic diagram of the stables in which the experimental animals were housed. Movement was from stables A to B, followed by C to D and then E, using the eastern, western and northern corridors. The central corridor was used to take dead animals to the post mortem hall or cold room. Proper biosafety and biosecurity procedures were followed and PPE was used for personnel safety and avoidance of cross contamination. Virus 1 (M66/09 variant) and virus 2 (M21/10 variant) were used to inoculate animals in groups 1 (stables A and B) and 2 (stables C and D), respectively, whereas group 3 animals (stable E) were either inoculated with virus 1 (W2E and W5E) or virus 2 (W4E and W6E) or with a mixture of the two viruses (L1E, L2E, L3E and L4E, and W3E, W8E and W9E). The control piglets and weaners were mock inoculated with TC medium and the ewes and lactating sows received no treatment. The stable codes constituted the animal identity suffixes; TABLE S1: Laboratory test results of group 1 animals. Only blood and swab pools of animals that demonstrated antibody presence on ELISA were tested on real time RT-PCR (newborn piglets were not swabbed). For blood, swab pools and sera, a negative result represents a collection of negative results of all the samples tested for the particular animal; TABLE S2: Laboratory test results of group 2 animals. Only blood and oronasorectal swab pools of animals that demonstrated antibody presence on ELISA were tested on real time RT-PCR (newborn piglets were not swabbed). For blood, oronasorectal swab pools and sera, a negative result represents a collection of negative results of all the samples tested for the particular animal; TABLE S3: Real time RT-PCR and blocking ELISA results of group 3 animals. For blood, oronasorectal swab pools and sera, a negative result represents a collection of negative results of all the samples tested for the particular animal; TABLE S4: Comparison of results of RVFV infectivity experiments in weaners conducted in this study and that of [15].

Show full item record