JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
| dc.contributor.author | Pistorius, L.R.
|
|
| dc.contributor.author | Bhora, I.
|
|
| dc.contributor.author | Snyman, L.
|
|
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-18T09:12:44Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-10-18T09:12:44Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021-11 | |
| dc.description.abstract | We read the article on a retrospective, observational study of medicolegal cases against obstetricians and gynaecologists in South Africa (SA)’s private sector with interest. On the surface, there is some good news for obstetrics. Contrary to expectations and international experience, the article suggests that medicolegal notifications for gynaecological mishaps are now (at least financially) a greater concern than obstetric claims. | en_US |
| dc.description.department | Obstetrics and Gynaecology | en_US |
| dc.description.librarian | dm2022 | en_US |
| dc.description.uri | http://www.samj.org.za | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Pistorius, L.R., Bhorat, I. & Snyman, L. Medicolegal cases against obstetricians. South African Medical Journal 2021 Nov 5;111(11):13439. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2021.v111i11.16070. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2078- 5135 (online) | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0256-9574 (print) | |
| dc.identifier.other | 10.7196/SAMJ.2021.v111i11.16070 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/87780 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | South African Medical Association | en_US |
| dc.rights | This open-access article is distributed under Creative Commons licence CC-BY-NC 4.0. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Medicolegal cases | en_US |
| dc.subject | Obstetricians | en_US |
| dc.subject | Gynaecologists | en_US |
| dc.subject | South Africa (SA) | en_US |
| dc.title | Medicolegal cases against obstetricians | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
