dc.contributor.author |
Jobson, Geoffrey
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Railton, Jean.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Mutasa, Barry
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Ranoto, Lucy
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Maluleke, Christine
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
McIntyre, James
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Struthers, Helen
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Peters, Remco P.H.
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2022-10-11T12:46:28Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2022-10-11T12:46:28Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2021-06-15 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
BACKGROUND : There is a lack of research on technical assistance (TA) interventions in
low- and middle-income countries. Variation in local contexts requires tailor-made
approaches to TA that are structured and replicable across intervention sites whilst retaining
the flexibility to adapt to local contexts. We developed a systematic process of TA using
multidisciplinary roving teams to provide support across the various elements comprising
local HIV services.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the effectiveness of targeting specific HIV and TB programme
indicators for improvement using roving teams.
METHOD: We conducted a cluster-randomised stepped-wedge evaluation of a TA support
package focussing on clinical, managerial and pharmacy services in the Mopani district of
the Limpopo province, South Africa (SA). Three roving teams delivered the intervention.
Seventeen primary and community healthcare centres that had 400–600 patients on antiretroviral
therapy (ART) were selected for inclusion. The TA package was implemented for six consecutive
months across facilities until all had received the same level of support. Data were collected
from the relevant health management information systems for 11 routine indicators.
RESULTS: The mean proportion of PLWH screened for tuberculosis (TB) at ART initiation
increased from 85.2% to 87.2% (P = 0.65). Rates of retention in care improved, with the mean
proportion of patients retained in care at three months post-ART initiation increasing from
79.9% to 87.4% (P < 0.001) and from 70.3% to 77.7% (P < 0.01) after six months. Finally, the
mean proportion of patients with TB who completed their treatment increased from 80.6% to
82.1% (P = 0.75).
CONCLUSION: Tailored TA interventions in SA using a standardised structure and process led to
a significant improvement in retention-in-care rates and to non-significant improvements in
the proportion of PLWH screened for TB and of those who completed their treatment. |
en_US |
dc.description.department |
Medical Microbiology |
en_US |
dc.description.librarian |
dm2022 |
en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship |
The American people through the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under Cooperative Agreement number 674-A-12-00015 to the Anova Health Institute. |
en_US |
dc.description.uri |
http://www.sajhivmed.org.za/index.php/hivmed |
en_US |
dc.identifier.citation |
Jobson, G.A., Railton, J., Mutasa, B., et al. Indicator-focussed technical assistance in South Africa’s HIV programme: A stepped-wedge evaluation. Southern African Journal of HIV Medicine 2021;22(1), a1229. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhivmed.v22i1.1229. |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
2078-6751 (online) |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
1608-9693 (print) |
|
dc.identifier.other |
10.4102/sajhivmed.v22i1.1229 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/87634 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
AOSIS |
en_US |
dc.rights |
© 2021. The Authors. Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License. |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Technical assistance |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Routine data |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Stepped wedge |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Retention in care |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Tuberculosis (TB) |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Antiretroviral therapy (ART) |
en_US |
dc.title |
Indicator-focussed technical assistance in South Africa’s HIV programme : a stepped-wedge evaluation |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |