dc.contributor.author |
Kanda, Artwell
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Ncube, Esper Jacobeth
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Voyi, K.V.V. (Kuku)
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2022-09-21T06:46:50Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2022-09-21T06:46:50Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2021-12-04 |
|
dc.description |
Supplementary File 1. Multistage sampling of households for Mbire district survey, northern Zimbabwe, 2021. |
en_US |
dc.description |
Supplementary File 2. Summary of selected households for Mbire district survey, Zimbabwe, 2021. |
en_US |
dc.description |
Supplementary File 3. Questionnaire for Mbire district, Zimbabwe
Questionnaire ID. |
en_US |
dc.description |
Supplementary File 4. Focus group guide. |
en_US |
dc.description |
Supplementary File 5. The integrated behavioural model for water, sanitation, and hygiene (IBM-WASH). |
en_US |
dc.description |
Supplementary File 6. Informed consent form. |
en_US |
dc.description |
Supplementary File 7. Characteristics of participants in focus group discussions, Mbire district, northern Zimbabwe, 2021 (n = 39). |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
Rural households have latrine preferences and unique sanitation needs. An assessment of
how rural households adapt their sanitation needs to a nationally encouraged latrine design was
done. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 790 households in a rural district of Zimbabwe
from November 2020 to May 2021. Data were analysed using logistic regression. Qualitative data
were collected using focus groups and analysed using thematic analysis. Analyses were done in
STATA 16 and considered significant at p < 0.05. There was low adoption of the Blair ventilated
improved pit latrine and its upgradable models. Significant predictor variables of BVIP latrine
adoption were mainly contextual and psychosocial at the individual and household levels. They
included source and level of household income, residence period, nature of homestead, number of
cattle owned, knowledge of sanitation options and perceived high latrine cost. The latrine design
was considered not a pro-poor option as it was unaffordable by many rural households resulting in
its non-completion, poor-quality designs, alternative options, sharing and open defaecation. Poverty
appears the main barrier for latrine ownership. However, a window of opportunity to improve access
to sanitation in rural Zimbabwe exists by considering alternative sanitation options and financial
investment mechanisms. |
en_US |
dc.description.department |
School of Health Systems and Public Health (SHSPH) |
en_US |
dc.description.librarian |
dm2022 |
en_US |
dc.description.uri |
https://www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability |
en_US |
dc.identifier.citation |
Kanda, A.; Ncube, E.J.;
Voyi, K. Adapting Sanitation Needs
to a Latrine Design (and Its
Upgradable Models): A Mixed
Method Study under Lower
Middle-Income Rural Settings.
Sustainability 2021, 13, 13444. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313444. |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
2071-1050 (online) |
|
dc.identifier.other |
10.3390/su132313444 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/87248 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
MDPI |
en_US |
dc.rights |
© 2021 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license. |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Access |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Alternative technology |
en_US |
dc.subject |
BVIP design |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Latrine ownership |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Rural sanitation |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Sustainable development |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Blair ventilated improved pit (BVIP) |
en_US |
dc.subject |
SDG-06: Clean water and sanitation |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Sustainable development goals (SDGs) |
en_US |
dc.title |
Adapting sanitation needs to a latrine design (and its upgradable models) : a mixed method study under lower middle-income rural settings |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |