Adapting sanitation needs to a latrine design (and its upgradable models) : a mixed method study under lower middle-income rural settings

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kanda, Artwell
dc.contributor.author Ncube, Esper Jacobeth
dc.contributor.author Voyi, K.V.V. (Kuku)
dc.date.accessioned 2022-09-21T06:46:50Z
dc.date.available 2022-09-21T06:46:50Z
dc.date.issued 2021-12-04
dc.description Supplementary File 1. Multistage sampling of households for Mbire district survey, northern Zimbabwe, 2021. en_US
dc.description Supplementary File 2. Summary of selected households for Mbire district survey, Zimbabwe, 2021. en_US
dc.description Supplementary File 3. Questionnaire for Mbire district, Zimbabwe Questionnaire ID. en_US
dc.description Supplementary File 4. Focus group guide. en_US
dc.description Supplementary File 5. The integrated behavioural model for water, sanitation, and hygiene (IBM-WASH). en_US
dc.description Supplementary File 6. Informed consent form. en_US
dc.description Supplementary File 7. Characteristics of participants in focus group discussions, Mbire district, northern Zimbabwe, 2021 (n = 39). en_US
dc.description.abstract Rural households have latrine preferences and unique sanitation needs. An assessment of how rural households adapt their sanitation needs to a nationally encouraged latrine design was done. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 790 households in a rural district of Zimbabwe from November 2020 to May 2021. Data were analysed using logistic regression. Qualitative data were collected using focus groups and analysed using thematic analysis. Analyses were done in STATA 16 and considered significant at p < 0.05. There was low adoption of the Blair ventilated improved pit latrine and its upgradable models. Significant predictor variables of BVIP latrine adoption were mainly contextual and psychosocial at the individual and household levels. They included source and level of household income, residence period, nature of homestead, number of cattle owned, knowledge of sanitation options and perceived high latrine cost. The latrine design was considered not a pro-poor option as it was unaffordable by many rural households resulting in its non-completion, poor-quality designs, alternative options, sharing and open defaecation. Poverty appears the main barrier for latrine ownership. However, a window of opportunity to improve access to sanitation in rural Zimbabwe exists by considering alternative sanitation options and financial investment mechanisms. en_US
dc.description.department School of Health Systems and Public Health (SHSPH) en_US
dc.description.librarian dm2022 en_US
dc.description.uri https://www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability en_US
dc.identifier.citation Kanda, A.; Ncube, E.J.; Voyi, K. Adapting Sanitation Needs to a Latrine Design (and Its Upgradable Models): A Mixed Method Study under Lower Middle-Income Rural Settings. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13444. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313444. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2071-1050 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.3390/su132313444
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/87248
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher MDPI en_US
dc.rights © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. en_US
dc.subject Access en_US
dc.subject Alternative technology en_US
dc.subject BVIP design en_US
dc.subject Latrine ownership en_US
dc.subject Rural sanitation en_US
dc.subject Sustainable development en_US
dc.subject Blair ventilated improved pit (BVIP) en_US
dc.subject SDG-06: Clean water and sanitation en_US
dc.subject Sustainable development goals (SDGs) en_US
dc.title Adapting sanitation needs to a latrine design (and its upgradable models) : a mixed method study under lower middle-income rural settings en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record