Adapted full-face snorkel masks as an alternative for COVID-19 personal protection during aerosol generating procedures in South Africa

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Herselman, Ronel
dc.contributor.author Lalloo, Vidya
dc.contributor.author Ueckermann, Veronica
dc.contributor.author Van Tonder, Daniel Johannes
dc.contributor.author De Jager, Edwin John
dc.contributor.author Spijkerman, Sandra
dc.contributor.author Van der Merwe, Wanda
dc.contributor.author Du Pisane, Marizane
dc.contributor.author Hattingh, Fanie
dc.contributor.author Stanton, David
dc.contributor.author Hofmeyr, Ross
dc.date.accessioned 2022-06-21T04:34:05Z
dc.date.available 2022-06-21T04:34:05Z
dc.date.issued 2021-12
dc.description APPENDIX A. SUPPLEMENTARY DATA. APPENDIX B. Fig. B1: A. The SEAC Libera full face snorkel mask, and B. The Mares Sea Vu Care full face snorkel masks, used in this study. Fig. B2: Adapter for A: SEAC Libera Med+ mask and B: Mares Sea Vu Care. Fig. B3: Clear-Guard 3 Breathing Filter used in this study. APPENDIX C. Intubation and extubation checklists. APPENDIX D. Comparison of the different snorkel masks. APPENDIX E. Google form to determine clinical usability of the full-face snorkel mask. en_US
dc.description.abstract INTRODUCTION : SARS-CoV-2 has resulted in increased worldwide demand for personal protective equipment (PPE). With pressure from ongoing epidemic and endemic episodes, we assessed an adapted snorkel mask that provides full-face protection for healthcare workers (HCWs), particularly during aerosol-generating procedures. These masks have a custom-made adaptor which allows the fitment of standard medical respiratory filters. The aim of this study was to evaluate the fit, seal and clinical usability of these masks. METHODS : This multicentre, non-blinded in-situ simulation study recruited fifty-two HCWs to don and doff the adapted snorkel mask. Negative pressure seal checks and a qualitative fit test were performed. The HCWs completed intubation and extubation of a manikin in a university skills training laboratory, followed by a webbased questionnaire on the clinical usability of the masks. RESULTS : Whilst fit and usability data were generally satisfactory, two of the 52 participants (3.8%) felt that the mask did not span the correct distance from the nose to the chin, and 3 of 34 participants (8.8%) who underwent qualitative testing with a Bitrex test failed. The majority of users reported no fogging, humidity or irritation. It was reportedly easy to speak while wearing the mask, although some participants perceived that they were not always understood. Twenty-one participants (40%) experienced a subjective physiological effect from wearing the mask; most commonly a sensation of shortness of breath. DISCUSSION : A fit-tested modified full-face snorkel mask may offer benefit as a substitute for N95 respirators and face shields. It is, however, important to properly select the correct mask based on size, fit testing, quality of the three-dimensional (3D) printed parts and respiratory filter to be used. Additionally, HCWs should be trained in the use of the mask, and each mask should be used by a single HCW and not shared. en_US
dc.description.department Anaesthesiology en_US
dc.description.department Internal Medicine en_US
dc.description.librarian am2022 en_US
dc.description.sponsorship The Faculty of Health Science, University of Pretoria who provided financial assistance through the Leeds University COVID-19 funds. en_US
dc.description.uri https://www.elsevier.com/locate/afjem en_US
dc.identifier.citation Herselman, R., Lalloo, V., Ueckermann, V. et al. 2021, 'Adapted full-face snorkel masks as an alternative for COVID-19 personal protection during aerosol generating procedures in South Africa', African Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 11, pp. 436-441, doi : 10.1016/j.afjem.2021.08.002. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2211-419X
dc.identifier.other 10.1016/j.afjem.2021.08.002
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/85870
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier en_US
dc.rights © 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd. CC BY 4.0 This is an open access article under the CC BY license. en_US
dc.subject Full-face snorkel mask en_US
dc.subject N95 alternatives en_US
dc.subject Personal protective equipment (PPE) en_US
dc.subject Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) en_US
dc.subject COVID-19 pandemic en_US
dc.subject Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) en_US
dc.subject.other Health sciences articles SDG-03
dc.subject.other SDG-03: Good health and well-being
dc.subject.other Health sciences articles SDG-09
dc.subject.other SDG-09: Industry, innovation and infrastructure
dc.subject.other Health sciences articles SDG-11
dc.subject.other SDG-11: Sustainable cities and communities
dc.title Adapted full-face snorkel masks as an alternative for COVID-19 personal protection during aerosol generating procedures in South Africa en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record