Methodological considerations in the professional accreditation research

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ayaya, Onesmus
dc.contributor.author Pretorius, Marius
dc.date.accessioned 2022-06-09T05:33:25Z
dc.date.available 2022-06-09T05:33:25Z
dc.date.issued 2021-10
dc.description.abstract This essay paper provides methodological considerations for research on turnaround management (business rescue) practitioner (BRP) accreditation. The article responds to recent BRP licensing debates and the need to enhance BRP capabilities through continuing professional development (CPD). We assess existing data collection procedures using the practice theory and demonstrate sequenced integrated data collection procedures (IDCPs) to study BRPs’ professional accreditation frameworks. We illustrate IDCPs using a research design for “how BRPs should be accredited by their professional bodies (PBs) before obtaining a practice license”. The proposed IDCPs call for the purposeful interpretation of legislative instruments governing BRP work and other multiple-party data collection techniques. The paper lays out the problems associated with using questionnaire surveys and semi-structured interviews to document BRP practices and the required professional capabilities. We propose a research design to illustrate the application of the IDCPs in a multiple PB occupation. en_US
dc.description.department Business Management en_US
dc.description.librarian pm2022 en_US
dc.description.uri http://www.sagepub.com/journals/Journal202037 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Ayaya O, Pretorius M. Methodological Considerations in the Professional Accreditation Research. SAGE Open 11(4): 1-20. October 2021. doi:10.1177/21582440211052557. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2158-2440 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1177/21582440211052557
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/85756
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Sage en_US
dc.rights © The Author(s) 2021. Creative Commons CC BY: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. en_US
dc.subject Accreditation en_US
dc.subject Double en_US
dc.subject Purposive en_US
dc.subject Interpretation en_US
dc.subject Interview en_US
dc.subject Integrated en_US
dc.subject Professional en_US
dc.subject Business rescue practitioners (BRPs) en_US
dc.subject Continuing professional development (CPD) en_US
dc.subject Integrated data collection procedure (IDCP) en_US
dc.subject Professional bodies (PBs) en_US
dc.title Methodological considerations in the professional accreditation research en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record