Subjective preferences for agricultural technology attributes and their influence on technical efficiency of smallholder maize farmers in Nakuru County, Kenya

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Mungatana, Eric D.
dc.contributor.coadvisor Jourdain, Damien
dc.contributor.postgraduate Mbaka, Zachary Simba
dc.date.accessioned 2022-05-23T07:49:23Z
dc.date.available 2022-05-23T07:49:23Z
dc.date.created 2022
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.description Dissertation (MSc Agric (Agricultural Economics))--University of Pretoria, 2022. en_US
dc.description.abstract The study investigates whether the subjective utility of goals driving farmers' technology choices influence technical efficiency, with objectives of improving allocation choices, and providing effective extension services. Main goals of smallholder maize farmers were identified using the best-worst scaling (BWS) approach and efficiency scores generated using stochastic frontier analysis (SFA). A comparison between farming goals and technical efficiency was established using principal component analysis (PCA), cluster analysis, and one-way ANOVA. The study used data collected from 187 randomly selected smallholder maize farmers from Nakuru County, in Kenya. The most crucial goals of farming technology were found to be increasing crop yields, decreasing production costs, and reducing pests and diseases. The least important goals of farming technology were, decreasing on-farm soil erosion, decreasing water requirement through the cropping cycle, and decreasing off-farm pollution. Mean efficiency score was 61% and not statistically significant across the cluster groups, implying that subjective preferences of farming technology do not influence technical efficiency among the group. All coefficients of farming goals were negative when regressed against SFA generated efficiency scores, inferring that current farming technologies lack important farming goals that drive them. The study concluded that subjective utilities of farming goals do not have a significant influence on technical efficiency, contrary to our expectation. we therefore recommend further research to be conducted, to test the robustness of the results and identify reasons for negative and significant relationship between off-farm environmental services and production efficiency. The study is the first one of its kind to relate subjective utility of goals driving farmers’ technology choices and technical efficiency, immensely contribution to the existing literature en_US
dc.description.availability Unrestricted en_US
dc.description.degree MSc Agric (Agricultural Economics) en_US
dc.description.department Agricultural Economics, Extension and Rural Development en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Borlaug Higher Education for Agricultural Research and Development (BHEARD) en_US
dc.identifier.citation * en_US
dc.identifier.other S2022
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/85613
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher University of Pretoria
dc.rights © 2022 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
dc.subject UCTD en_US
dc.subject Technical efficiency en_US
dc.subject Best-Worst scaling
dc.subject Farming goals
dc.subject Farming technology
dc.subject Smallholder farmers
dc.subject Principal component analysis
dc.subject Cluster analysis
dc.subject Cluster groups
dc.title Subjective preferences for agricultural technology attributes and their influence on technical efficiency of smallholder maize farmers in Nakuru County, Kenya en_US
dc.type Dissertation en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record