Referral criteria for preschool hearing screening in resource-constrained settings : a comparison of protocols

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Eksteen, Susan
dc.contributor.author Eikelboom, Robert H.
dc.contributor.author Launer, Stefan
dc.contributor.author Kuper, Hannah
dc.contributor.author Swanepoel, De Wet
dc.date.accessioned 2022-05-17T04:55:22Z
dc.date.available 2022-05-17T04:55:22Z
dc.date.issued 2021-07
dc.description.abstract PURPOSE : This study aimed to describe and compare the performance of two screening protocols used for preschool hearing screening in resource-constrained settings. METHOD : Secondary data analysis was done to determine the performance of two protocols implemented during a preschool hearing screening program using mobile health technology in South Africa. Pure-tone audiometry screening at 25 dB HL for 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz in each ear was used by both protocols. The fail criterion for the first protocol (2,147 children screened) constituted a no-response on one or more frequencies in either ear. The second protocol required two or more no-responses (5,782 children). Multivariate logistic regression models were used to investigate associations between outcomes and protocol, age, gender, and duration. RESULTS : Fail rates for the one-frequency fail protocol was 8.7% (n = 186) and 4.3% (n = 250) for the two-frequency fail protocol. Children screened with the two-frequency fail protocol were 52.9% less likely to fail (p < .001; OR = 0.471; 95% confidence interval [0.385, 0.575]). Gender (p = .251) and age (p = .570) had no significant effect on screening outcome. A percentage of cases screened (44.7%) exceeded permissible noise levels in at least one ear at 1000 Hz across both protocols. True- and false-positive cases did not differ significantly between protocols. Protocol type (p = .204), gender (p = .314), and age (p = .982) did not affect the odds of being a true-positive result. Average screening time was 72.8 s (78.66 SD) and 64.9 s (55.78 SD) for the onefrequency and two-frequency fail protocols, respectively. CONCLUSIONS : A two-frequency fail criterion and immediate rescreen of failed frequencies significantly reduced referral rate for follow-up services that are often overburdened in resourced-constrained settings. Future protocol adaptations can also consider increasing the screening levels at 1000 Hz to minimize the influence of environmental noise. en_US
dc.description.department Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology en_US
dc.description.librarian am2022 en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Sonova AG, the Newton Advanced Fellowship Award, the Carel du Toit Centre and Trust and the Hear the World Foundation. en_US
dc.description.uri https://pubs.asha.org/journal/lshss en_US
dc.identifier.citation Eksteen, S., Eikelboom, R.H., Launer, S. et al. 2021, 'Referral criteria for preschool hearing screening in resource-constrained settings : a comparison of protocols', Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, vol. 52 , pp. 868-876. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0161-1461 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 1558-9129 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1044/2021_LSHSS-21-00008
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/85223
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher American Speech-Language-Hearing Association en_US
dc.rights © 2021 The Authors. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. en_US
dc.subject Screening protocols en_US
dc.subject Preschool hearing screening en_US
dc.subject Children en_US
dc.subject Ear en_US
dc.title Referral criteria for preschool hearing screening in resource-constrained settings : a comparison of protocols en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record