We are excited to announce that the repository will soon undergo an upgrade, featuring a new look and feel along with several enhanced features to improve your experience. Please be on the lookout for further updates and announcements regarding the launch date. We appreciate your support and look forward to unveiling the improved platform soon.
dc.contributor.author | Pheiffer, Carmen![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Pillay-van Wyk, Victoria![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Turawa, Eunice![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Levitt, Naomi![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Kengne, Andre P.![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Bradshaw, Debbie![]() |
|
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-04-07T14:50:37Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-04-07T14:50:37Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-05-30 | |
dc.description | SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL : Table S1: PRISMA 2009 Checklist. Table S2: PubMed search strategy. Table S3: Quality assessment criteria for prevalence studies. Table S4: Prevalence of T2DM in South Africans aged 25 years and older. Table S5: Prevalence of IGT, IFG and undiagnosed T2DM in South Africans aged 25 years and older. Table S6: Level of evidence as qualified with GRADE. Figure S1: Funnel plot of included studies. | en_ZA |
dc.description.abstract | Synthesis of existing prevalence data using rigorous systematic review methods is considered an effective strategy to generate representative and robust prevalence figures to inform health planning and policy. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify, collate, and synthesise all studies reporting the prevalence of total and newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (T2DM), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and impaired fasting glucose (IFG) in South Africa. Four databases, PubMed, Scopus,Web of Science, and African Index Medicus were searched for articles published between January 1997 and June 2020. A total of 1886 articles were identified, of which 11 were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence in individuals 25 years and older was 15.25% (11.07–19.95%) for T2DM, 9.59% (5.82–14.17%) for IGT, 3.55% (0.38–9.61%) for IFG, and 8.29% (4.97–12.34%) for newly diagnosed T2DM. Although our pooled estimate may be imprecise due to significant heterogeneity across studies with regard to population group, age, gender, setting, diagnostic test, and study design, we provide evidence that the burden of glucose intolerance in South Africa is high. These factors contribute to the paucity of representative T2DM prevalence data. There is a need for well-designed epidemiological studies that use best-practice and standardised methods to assess prevalence. | en_ZA |
dc.description.department | Obstetrics and Gynaecology | en_ZA |
dc.description.librarian | am2022 | en_ZA |
dc.description.sponsorship | The South African Medical Research Council | en_ZA |
dc.description.uri | https://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.citation | Pheiffer, C.; Pillay-van Wyk, V.; Turawa, E.; Levitt, N.; Kengne, A.P.; Bradshaw, D. Prevalence of Type 2 Diabetes in South Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021, 18, 5868. https://DOI.org/ 10.3390/ijerph18115868. | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.issn | 1660-4601 (online) | |
dc.identifier.other | 10.3390/ijerph18115868 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/84828 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_ZA |
dc.publisher | MDPI Publishing | en_ZA |
dc.rights | © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Prevalence | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Newly diagnosed diabetes | en_ZA |
dc.subject | South Africa (SA) | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Impaired fasting glucose (IFG) | en_ZA |
dc.title | Prevalence of type 2 diabetes in South Africa : a systematic review and meta-analysis | en_ZA |
dc.type | Article | en_ZA |