Abstract:
Synthesis of existing prevalence data using rigorous systematic review methods is considered
an effective strategy to generate representative and robust prevalence figures to inform health
planning and policy. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify, collate, and synthesise
all studies reporting the prevalence of total and newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (T2DM), impaired
glucose tolerance (IGT), and impaired fasting glucose (IFG) in South Africa. Four databases, PubMed,
Scopus,Web of Science, and African Index Medicus were searched for articles published between
January 1997 and June 2020. A total of 1886 articles were identified, of which 11 were included in the
meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence in individuals 25 years and older was 15.25% (11.07–19.95%)
for T2DM, 9.59% (5.82–14.17%) for IGT, 3.55% (0.38–9.61%) for IFG, and 8.29% (4.97–12.34%) for newly
diagnosed T2DM. Although our pooled estimate may be imprecise due to significant heterogeneity
across studies with regard to population group, age, gender, setting, diagnostic test, and study design,
we provide evidence that the burden of glucose intolerance in South Africa is high. These factors
contribute to the paucity of representative T2DM prevalence data. There is a need for well-designed
epidemiological studies that use best-practice and standardised methods to assess prevalence.
Description:
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL : Table S1: PRISMA 2009 Checklist. Table S2: PubMed search strategy. Table S3: Quality assessment criteria for prevalence studies. Table S4: Prevalence of T2DM in South Africans aged 25 years and older. Table S5: Prevalence of IGT, IFG and undiagnosed T2DM in South Africans aged 25 years and older. Table S6: Level of evidence as qualified with GRADE. Figure S1: Funnel plot of included studies.