dc.contributor.author |
Rothgangel, Martin
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Riegel, Ulrich
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2022-03-24T08:03:00Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2022-03-24T08:03:00Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2021-10-28 |
|
dc.description |
Special Collection: Scholarly Voices, sub-edited by Yolanda Dreyer (University of Pretoria). |
en_ZA |
dc.description.abstract |
A look at history showed that theology always has to face contemporary demands in terms of
its scientific character. At present, processes of pluralisation and secularisation challenge the
existence of theology at universities not only against the background of religious studies,
which are independent of the churches, but also, for example, in relation to innovative life
sciences or cognitive sciences. In this context, an essential point to consider was that theology –
like social systems in general and science in particular – is characterised by an increasing
differentiation. This differentiation of science implied an increasing specialisation of research,
which could also be observed in the field of theology and its sub-disciplines. This article
accordingly addressed the question of how, in the face of increasingly specialised research
studies, the unity of theology can be justified beyond abstract and sweeping determinations.
The present contribution suggested that in this respect a model of research designs developed
in religious didactics might prove useful. This model of research design could essentially be
understood as consisting of three research dimensions (topics, reference theories and
methodologies) that define a research space, in which the research study on the didactics of
religion can be located in the three-dimensional space by the research goal as a formatting
factor. The three dimensions of this model (topics, reference theories and methodologies),
including the research goal, seemed to be broad enough to be tested in other sub-disciplines of
theology as well to see whether their research can be more closely defined with them.
CONTRIBUTION : Accordingly, the contribution of this article was to raise the question, in view of
an increasing specialisation of theological research, to what extent a model of research designs
developed in the didactics of religion could be transferred to other sub-disciplines of theology.
Should this succeed a new approach to justifying the unity of theology could become available,
which is able to take into account the current differentiation of theology. |
en_ZA |
dc.description.department |
Practical Theology |
en_ZA |
dc.description.librarian |
am2022 |
en_ZA |
dc.description.uri |
http://www.hts.org.za |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.citation |
Rothgangel, M. & Riegel, U.,
2021, ‘Reflecting theology by
a generic model of research
designs? Impulses from
religious didactics’, HTS
Teologiese Studies/
Theological Studies 77(2),
a7023. https://DOI.org/10.4102/hts.v77i2.7023. |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.issn |
0259-9422 (print) |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
2072-8050 (online) |
|
dc.identifier.other |
10.4102/hts.v77i2.7023 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/84606 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_ZA |
dc.publisher |
AOSIS |
en_ZA |
dc.rights |
© 2021. The Authors.
Licensee: AOSIS. This work
is licensed under the
Creative Commons
Attribution License. |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Research design |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Differentiation of theology |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Unity of theology |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Theology as science |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Specialisation of theological research |
en_ZA |
dc.subject.other |
Theology articles SDG-04 |
|
dc.subject.other |
SDG-04: Quality education |
|
dc.subject.other |
Theology articles SDG-10 |
|
dc.subject.other |
SDG-10: Reduced inequalities |
|
dc.title |
Reflecting theology by a generic model of research designs? Impulses from religious didactics |
en_ZA |
dc.type |
Article |
en_ZA |