Please note that UPSpace will be unavailable from Friday, 2 May at 18:00 (South African Time) until Sunday, 4 May at 20:00 due to scheduled system upgrades. We apologise for any inconvenience this may cause and appreciate your understanding.
dc.contributor.author | Nunez Godoy, Cristina Cecilia![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Pienaar, Elizabeth Frances![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Branch, Lyn C.![]() |
|
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-02T12:52:46Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-05 | |
dc.description | SUPPLEMENTARY DATA: Appendix 1. Spatial data processing used to determine study area | en_ZA |
dc.description | Appendix 2. Survey to elicit landowners’ preferences for program options to protect and manage forests in Salta. | en_ZA |
dc.description | Appendix 3. Fractional factorial design of the choice experiment. | en_ZA |
dc.description | Appendix 4. Lists of statements used in previous studies to assess ownership motives and attitudes toward forest policy tools. | en_ZA |
dc.description | Appendix 5. Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test, Bartlett’s test of sphericity, and Determinant value used to verify data’s appropriateness for factor analysis. | en_ZA |
dc.description | Appendix 6. Logistic regression used to test for sampling bias based on land size and land- use zoning restrictions. | en_ZA |
dc.description.abstract | To effectively conserve forests and the ecosystem services they provide, mechanisms are needed to promote conservation on private lands that reduce forest fragmentation, secure lands with high conservation value, and enhance landscape connectivity. Incentive-based programs like payments for ecosystem services (PES) are important policy tools for attaining conservation on private lands. In 2019, we conducted 81 in-person surveys with private forestland owners, whose properties are located on the border of protected areas and in corridors connecting protected areas in Argentina's Chaco forest. We examined landowners' preferences for alternative conservation incentives, how Argentina's current PES program could be altered to increase landowner enrollment, and the amount of compensation landowners require to enroll in PES. We found that knowledge of Argentina's PES program, motivations for forest ownership, attitudes toward forest conservation policy, and property characteristics influenced landowners' preferences for conservation program design. Although indigenous communities preferred conservation easements, other private landowners were more likely to choose a PES program. Research participants preferred PES programs with shorter contract lengths or that permitted them to engage in silvopasture. The payments research participants required to engage in land uses currently authorized under Argentina's PES program exceed current PES funding. Relying solely on PES to engage landowners in conservation may result in lost opportunities to conserve forest on private lands. | en_ZA |
dc.description.department | Mammal Research Institute | en_ZA |
dc.description.embargo | 2023-03-01 | |
dc.description.librarian | hj2022 | en_ZA |
dc.description.sponsorship | The University of Florida's Tropical Conservation and Development Program, Neotropical Grassland Conservancy, and Rufford Foundation. | en_ZA |
dc.description.uri | http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.citation | Nunez Godoy, C.C., Pienaar, E.F. & Branch, L.C. 2022, 'Willingness of private landowners to participate in forest conservation in the Chaco region of Argentina', Forest Policy and Economics, vol. 138, art. 102708, pp. 1-12. | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.issn | 1389-9341 (print) | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1872-7050 (online) | |
dc.identifier.other | 10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102708 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/84304 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_ZA |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_ZA |
dc.rights | © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Notice : this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Forest Policy and Economics. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. A definitive version was subsequently published in Forest Policy and Economics, vol. 138, art. 102708, pp. 1-12, 2022. doi : 10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102708. | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Payments for ecosystem services (PES) | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Incentives | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Silvopasture | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Socio-psychological characteristics | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Stated preference choice experiments | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Voluntary enrollment | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Argentina | en_ZA |
dc.title | Willingness of private landowners to participate in forest conservation in the Chaco region of Argentina | en_ZA |
dc.type | Postprint Article | en_ZA |