How often should dead‑reckoned animal movement paths be corrected for drift?

Please note that UPSpace will be unavailable from Friday, 2 May at 18:00 (South African Time) until Sunday, 4 May at 20:00 due to scheduled system upgrades. We apologise for any inconvenience this may cause and appreciate your understanding.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Gunner, Richard M.
dc.contributor.author Holton, Mark D.
dc.contributor.author Scantlebury, David M.
dc.contributor.author Hopkins, Phil
dc.contributor.author Shepard, Emily L.C.
dc.contributor.author Fell, Adam J.
dc.contributor.author Garde, Baptiste
dc.contributor.author Quintana, Flavio
dc.contributor.author Gomez‑Laich, Agustina
dc.contributor.author Yoda, Ken
dc.contributor.author Yamamoto, Takashi
dc.contributor.author English, Holly
dc.contributor.author Ferreira, Sam
dc.contributor.author Govender, Danny
dc.contributor.author Viljoen, Pauli
dc.contributor.author Bruns, Angela
dc.contributor.author Van Schalkwyk, Ockert Louis
dc.contributor.author Cole, Nik C.
dc.contributor.author Tatayah, Vikash
dc.contributor.author Borger, Luca
dc.contributor.author Redcliffe, James
dc.contributor.author Bell, Stephen H.
dc.contributor.author Marks, Nikki J.
dc.contributor.author Bennett, Nigel Charles
dc.contributor.author Tonini, Mariano H.
dc.contributor.author Williams, Hannah J.
dc.contributor.author Duarte, Carlos M.
dc.contributor.author Van Rooyen, Martin C.
dc.contributor.author Bertelsen, Mads F.
dc.contributor.author Tambling, Craig J.
dc.contributor.author Wilson, Rory P.
dc.date.accessioned 2022-02-01T10:43:35Z
dc.date.available 2022-02-01T10:43:35Z
dc.date.issued 2021-10-16
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND : Understanding what animals do in time and space is important for a range of ecological questions, however accurate estimates of how animals use space is challenging. Within the use of animal-attached tags, radio telemetry (including the Global Positioning System, ‘GPS’) is typically used to verify an animal’s location periodically. Straight lines are typically drawn between these ‘Verified Positions’ (‘VPs’) so the interpolation of space-use is limited by the temporal and spatial resolution of the system’s measurement. As such, parameters such as route-taken and distance travelled can be poorly represented when using VP systems alone. Dead-reckoning has been suggested as a technique to improve the accuracy and resolution of reconstructed movement paths, whilst maximising battery life of VP systems. This typically involves deriving travel vectors from motion sensor systems and periodically correcting path dimensions for drift with simultaneously deployed VP systems. How often paths should be corrected for drift, however, has remained unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS : Here, we review the utility of dead-reckoning across four contrasting model species using different forms of locomotion (the African lion Panthera leo, the red-tailed tropicbird Phaethon rubricauda, the Magellanic penguin Spheniscus magellanicus, and the imperial cormorant Leucocarbo atriceps). Simulations were performed to examine the extent of dead-reckoning error, relative to VPs, as a function of Verified Position correction (VP correction) rate and the effect of this on estimates of distance moved. Dead-reckoning error was greatest for animals travelling within air and water. We demonstrate how sources of measurement error can arise within VP-corrected dead-reckoned tracks and propose advancements to this procedure to maximise dead-reckoning accuracy. CONCLUSIONS : We review the utility of VP-corrected dead-reckoning according to movement type and consider a range of ecological questions that would benefit from dead-reckoning, primarily concerning animal–barrier interactions and foraging strategies. en_ZA
dc.description.department Mammal Research Institute en_ZA
dc.description.department Veterinary Tropical Diseases en_ZA
dc.description.department Zoology and Entomology en_ZA
dc.description.librarian am2022 en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorship This research contributes to the CAASE project funded by King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) under the KAUST Sensor Initiative. Fieldwork in the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park was supported in part by a Department for Economy Global Challenges Research Fund. Fieldwork within the Chubut Province was supported in part by the National Agency for Scientific and Technological Promotion of Argentina and the Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. Fieldwork at Round Island, Mauritius, was supported by the European Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme grant. en_ZA
dc.description.uri https://animalbiotelemetry.biomedcentral.com en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Gunner, R.M., Holton, M.D., Scantlebury, D.M. et al. 2021, 'How often should dead‑reckoned animal movement paths be corrected for drift?', Animal Biotelemetry, vol. 9, no. 1, art. 43, pp. 1-22. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 2050-3385
dc.identifier.other 10.1186/s40317-021-00265-9
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/83558
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher BMC en_ZA
dc.rights © The Author(s) 2021. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. en_ZA
dc.subject Biologging en_ZA
dc.subject Dead-reckoning en_ZA
dc.subject Drift en_ZA
dc.subject Animal tracking en_ZA
dc.subject Tilt-compensated compass en_ZA
dc.subject GPS correction en_ZA
dc.subject Global positioning system (GPS) en_ZA
dc.subject.other Veterinary science articles SDG-15 en_ZA
dc.subject.other SDG-15: Life on land
dc.title How often should dead‑reckoned animal movement paths be corrected for drift? en_ZA
dc.type Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record