Please note that UPSpace will be unavailable from Friday, 2 May at 18:00 (South African Time) until Sunday, 4 May at 20:00 due to scheduled system upgrades.
We apologise for any inconvenience this may cause and appreciate your understanding.
How often should dead‑reckoned animal movement paths be corrected for drift?
Gunner, Richard M.; Holton, Mark D.; Scantlebury, David M.; Hopkins, Phil; Shepard, Emily L.C.; Fell, Adam J.; Garde, Baptiste; Quintana, Flavio; Gomez‑Laich, Agustina; Yoda, Ken; Yamamoto, Takashi; English, Holly; Ferreira, Sam; Govender, Danny; Viljoen, Pauli; Bruns, Angela; Van Schalkwyk, Ockert Louis; Cole, Nik C.; Tatayah, Vikash; Borger, Luca; Redcliffe, James; Bell, Stephen H.; Marks, Nikki J.; Bennett, Nigel Charles; Tonini, Mariano H.; Williams, Hannah J.; Duarte, Carlos M.; Van Rooyen, Martin C.; Bertelsen, Mads F.; Tambling, Craig J.; Wilson, Rory P.
Date:
2021-10-16
Abstract:
BACKGROUND : Understanding what animals do in time and space is important for a range of ecological questions,
however accurate estimates of how animals use space is challenging. Within the use of animal-attached tags, radio
telemetry (including the Global Positioning System, ‘GPS’) is typically used to verify an animal’s location periodically.
Straight lines are typically drawn between these ‘Verified Positions’ (‘VPs’) so the interpolation of space-use is limited
by the temporal and spatial resolution of the system’s measurement. As such, parameters such as route-taken and
distance travelled can be poorly represented when using VP systems alone. Dead-reckoning has been suggested as a
technique to improve the accuracy and resolution of reconstructed movement paths, whilst maximising battery life
of VP systems. This typically involves deriving travel vectors from motion sensor systems and periodically correcting
path dimensions for drift with simultaneously deployed VP systems. How often paths should be corrected for drift,
however, has remained unclear.
METHODS AND RESULTS : Here, we review the utility of dead-reckoning across four contrasting model species using different
forms of locomotion (the African lion Panthera leo, the red-tailed tropicbird Phaethon rubricauda, the Magellanic
penguin Spheniscus magellanicus, and the imperial cormorant Leucocarbo atriceps). Simulations were performed to
examine the extent of dead-reckoning error, relative to VPs, as a function of Verified Position correction (VP correction)
rate and the effect of this on estimates of distance moved. Dead-reckoning error was greatest for animals travelling
within air and water. We demonstrate how sources of measurement error can arise within VP-corrected dead-reckoned
tracks and propose advancements to this procedure to maximise dead-reckoning accuracy.
CONCLUSIONS : We review the utility of VP-corrected dead-reckoning according to movement type and consider a
range of ecological questions that would benefit from dead-reckoning, primarily concerning animal–barrier interactions
and foraging strategies.
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)