Abstract:
This note is devoted to stories of transformation and
change, stories of countries, communities and families
that make the journey from ‘poor’ to ‘prosperous’.
These are not stories of miracles that peddle in false
hope or that are filled with naïve optimism. The cases
covered in this note deal with common problems,
common ingredients and common sense to explore
and examine how ordinary places become extraordinary.
These cases are presented at a time when the South
African economy is trapped in a low growth state, with
deeply entrenched inequalities that retard economic
mobility, confine capabilities, scar social welfare and
narrow the path to prosperity. For South Africa, these
deep-rooted problems are structural in nature, but they
are by no means unique. Other countries have faced
equal or greater challenges, and their transformation
offers South Africa lessons and guides. Getting the
country onto a prosperous path demands that we identify
the constraints that bind South Africa, square up to the
reality and establish the right structural levers to pull
for the greatest impact to achieve elevated, inclusive,
sustainable and transformative growth. The evidence
explored in this note flag a primary constraint – South
Africa’s dire savings-investment deficit – and the
experiences of other countries point to ways in which
this binding constraint can be broken.
The South African economy has set up residence
in low-growth terrain. Over the past decade, from the
financial crisis of 2008 to the end of 2018, the country’s
economic growth rate has averaged just 1.5% a year.
This is barely ahead of the population growth rate of 1.2%
a year, which translates into a decade-long economic stall.
Cyril Ramaphosa’s presidency has promised to release
the country from this low growth trap. However, for this
policy proposal to translate into reality, South Africa must
square up to its structural constraints. On this score,
the evidence from the so-called ‘miracle economies’
lays bare a fundamental weakness in the country’s
economic architecture: a pervasive gap between the
available level of savings to fund the level of investment
needed to achieve elevated economic growth, fund new
firms and infrastructure, drive competitiveness, create jobs
and transform the social and industrial landscapes. If the
Ramaphosa administration’s ambition is to step up to the
plate to deliver on the proposal of 5.4% economic growth
a year, as set out in South Africa’s National Development
Plan (NDP), there is an abundance of evidence and ideas
from countries that have achieved elevated and inclusive
growth on what is needed to close the savings-investment
gap. The burgeoning field of behavioural economics adds
to this endeavour by presenting the science of how this
gap is closed by engaging households, firms, families
and individuals.