The patient's opinion regarding different service delivery models for voice therapy

Abstract

PURPOSE : The purpose of this study was to compare the voice patient's opinion regarding three service delivery models for voice therapy: a short-term intensive voice therapy with individual sessions (IVT-I), a short-term intensive voice therapy with group sessions (IVT-G), or a long-term traditional voice therapy with individual sessions (TVT). METHOD : Forty-six adult voice patients who followed either IVT-I, IVT-G, or TVT were contacted by e-mail with the request to fill in an online questionnaire reviewing their opinion about the received therapy. Several items concerning satisfaction, progress, time-related variables, transfer, and need for further therapy were scored by means of visual analog scales. Participants were also asked whether or not they continued voice therapy after the study. RESULTS : There were no significant differences between the three groups regarding the patients' perception of vocal quality improvement, degree of resolution of the voice disorder, duration of one session, total therapy duration, degree of transfer, need for further therapy, and actual continuation of therapy. A higher satisfaction rate was found for patients of the IVT-I and TVT groups than patients of the IVT-G group. The IVT-I group rated the therapy as too frequent compared with the TVT group who rated the frequency as optimal. CONCLUSION : Results suggest that patients are equally satisfied and perceive a similar progress after individual short-term intensive voice therapy and individual long-term traditional voice therapy. This finding creates flexibility in selecting time-related variables depending on the specific case and situation. Patients who received individual therapy were more satisfied than patients who received group therapy. Future larger scale investigation is needed to confirm these results.