Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of a non-living anthrax vaccine versus a live spore vaccine with simultaneous penicillin-G treatment in cattle

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Jauro, Solomon
dc.contributor.author Ndumnego, Okechukwu C.
dc.contributor.author Ellis, Charlotte Elizabeth
dc.contributor.author Buys, Angela
dc.contributor.author Beyer, Wolfgang
dc.contributor.author Van Heerden, Henriette
dc.date.accessioned 2021-10-19T12:08:16Z
dc.date.available 2021-10-19T12:08:16Z
dc.date.issued 2020-10-09
dc.description Supplementary Data: Table S1. The Anti-recombinant protective antigen (rPA) and anti-formalin inactivated spores (FIS) IgG titres (log10) in cattle vaccinated at weeks 0 and 3 and measured at weeks 0, 3, and 5 (with means and standard deviations). Cattle were vaccinated twice (weeks 0 and 3) with purified rPA (PrPA) + FIS + Pen-G (penicillin-G), crude rPA (CrPA) + FIS + Pen-G, SLSV + FIS + Pen-G, SLSV and NegCtl + PenG(vaccinated with Emulsigen-D®/Alhydrogel® plus Pen-G), Table S2. The anti-recombinant protective antigen (rPA) and anti-formalin inactivate Bacillus anthracis 34F2 spores (FIS) titres (log10) of di erent isotypes in vaccinated cattle (with means and standard deviations) of immunoglobulin isotypes titre of vaccinated cattle measured at weeks 0, 3 (two weeks after first vaccination) and 5 (two weeks after second vaccination). en_ZA
dc.description.abstract Sterne live spore vaccine (SLSV) is the current veterinary anthrax vaccine of choice. Unlike the non-living anthrax vaccine (NLAV) prototype, SLSV is incompatible with concurrent antibiotics use in an anthrax outbreak scenario. The NLAV candidates used in this study include a crude recombinant protective antigen (CrPA) and a purified recombinant protective antigen (PrPA) complemented by formalin-inactivated spores and Emulsigen-D®/Alhydrogel® adjuvants. Cattle were vaccinated twice (week 0 and 3) with NLAVs plus penicillin-G (Pen-G) treatment and compared to cattle vaccinated twice with SLSV alone and with Pen-G treatment. The immunogenicity was assessed using ELISA against rPA and FIS, toxin neutralisation assay (TNA) and opsonophagocytic assay. The protection was evaluated using an in vivo passive immunisation mouse model. The anti-rPA IgG titres for NLAVs plus Pen-G and SLSV without Pen-G treatment showed a significant increase, whereas the titres for SLSV plus Pen-G were insignificant compared to pre-vaccination values. A similar trend was measured for IgM, IgG1, and IgG2 and TNA titres (NT50) showed similar trends to anti-rPA titres across all vaccine groups. The anti-FIS IgG and IgM titres increased significantly for all vaccination groups at week 3 and 5 when compared to week 0. The spore opsonising capacity increased significantly in the NLAV vaccinated groups including Pen-G treatment and the SLSV without Pen-G but much less in the SLSV group with Pen-G treatment. Passive immunization of A/J mice challenged with a lethal dose of 34F2 spores indicated significant protective capacity of antibodies raised in the SLSV and the PrPA + FIS + adjuvants vaccinated and Pen-G treated groups but not for the NLAV with the CrPA + FIS + adjuvants and the SLSV vaccinated and Pen-G treated group. Our findings indicate that the PrPA + FIS + Emulsigen-D®/Alhydrogel® vaccine candidate may provide the same level of antibody responses and protective capacity as the SLSV. Advantageously, it can be used concurrently with Penicillin-G in an outbreak situation and as prophylactic treatment in feedlots and valuable breeding stocks. en_ZA
dc.description.department Veterinary Tropical Diseases en_ZA
dc.description.librarian am2021 en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorship Technology Innovation Agency (TIA) and National Research Foundation (NRF) South Africa. The publication cost was funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG). en_ZA
dc.description.uri http://www.mdpi.com/journal/vaccines en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Jauro, S., Ndumnego, O.C., Ellis, C. et al. 2020, 'Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of a non-living anthrax vaccine versus a live spore vaccine with simultaneous penicillin-G treatment in cattle', Vaccines, vol. 8, art. 595, pp. 1-16. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 2076-393X (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.3390/vaccines8040595
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/82184
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher MDPI en_ZA
dc.rights © 2020 by the authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. en_ZA
dc.subject Anthrax en_ZA
dc.subject Animal vaccination en_ZA
dc.subject Non-living vaccine en_ZA
dc.subject Sterne live spore vaccine (SLSV) en_ZA
dc.subject Veterinary anthrax vaccine en_ZA
dc.subject Crude recombinant protective antigen (CrPA) en_ZA
dc.subject Non-living anthrax vaccine (NLAV) en_ZA
dc.subject Purified recombinant protective antigen (PrPA) en_ZA
dc.title Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of a non-living anthrax vaccine versus a live spore vaccine with simultaneous penicillin-G treatment in cattle en_ZA
dc.type Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record