Farmers’ preference for cropping systems and the development of sustainable intensification : a choice experiment approach

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Jourdain, Damien
dc.contributor.author Lairez, Juliette
dc.contributor.author Striffler, Bruno
dc.contributor.author Affholder, Francois
dc.date.accessioned 2021-08-31T08:28:02Z
dc.date.available 2021-08-31T08:28:02Z
dc.date.issued 2020-12
dc.description SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL 1: Annex A: Choice Experiment Section of the Survey en_ZA
dc.description SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL 2: Annex B: The Mixed Logit Model (ML) en_ZA
dc.description SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL 3: Annex C: Mixed Logit or Latent Class Logit en_ZA
dc.description SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL 4: Annex D: Calculations of the marginal rate of substitution for continuous and effect-coded variables en_ZA
dc.description SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL 5: Annex E: Preference clusters: descriptive statistics and distributions en_ZA
dc.description.abstract Sustainable intensification (SI) of farming systems aims to increase food production from existing farmland in ways that have a lower environmental impact and maintain the food production capacity over time. SI embraces a set of diverse agricultural technologies that share a common feature: their adoption is dependent on the interactions between farmers’ decision-making processes, locally specific agro-ecological conditions, and the traits of the technology itself. There are concerns about the sustainability of the maize mono-cropping systems that are in use in Laosc today. Therefore, we used discrete choice experiments (DCE) to explore the potential adoption or alternative agricultural systems. We analyse the heterogeneity of farmers’ preferences and willingness to pay for different cropping system attributes using a mixed logit model, and we discuss the possible drivers and barriers to the adoption of these more sustainable options. The results suggest the existence of four types of farmers: “fertility-minded”, “factor-constrained”, “maximisers”, and “risk-averse”. Each type of farmers was likely to react differently to the proposed sustainable intensification techniques. Overall, the DCE appeared to be an efficient tool to elicit the diversity of farmer preferences in an agricultural region and for fine-tuning strategies for successful research and development of sustainable intensification. en_ZA
dc.description.department Agricultural Economics, Extension and Rural Development en_ZA
dc.description.librarian hj2021 en_ZA
dc.description.uri https://www.springer.com/journal/41130 en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Jourdain, D., Lairez, J., Striffler, B. et al. Farmers’ preference for cropping systems and the development of sustainable intensification: a choice experiment approach. Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies 101, 417–437 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41130-020-00100-4. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 2425-6870 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 2425-6897 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1007/s41130-020-00100-4
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/81551
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher Springer en_ZA
dc.rights © 2020, INRAE and Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature. The original publication is available at : https://www.springer.com/journal/41130. en_ZA
dc.subject Sustainable intensification (SI) en_ZA
dc.subject Agro-ecological agriculture en_ZA
dc.subject Adoption of innovations en_ZA
dc.subject Mixed logit en_ZA
dc.subject Farmer preferences en_ZA
dc.subject Maize en_ZA
dc.title Farmers’ preference for cropping systems and the development of sustainable intensification : a choice experiment approach en_ZA
dc.type Postprint Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record