Abstract:
The cue for this article is human rationality being the cornerstone in Wentzel van Huyssteen’s
thinking, and Alister McGrath’s scepsis about the feasibility of a postfoundational
transversality in particular. This article does not intend to juxtapose Van Huyssteen’s
postfoundational rationality to McGrath’s enterprise of a ‘rational consilience’ but
contends that a transversal approach to rationality engages social ramifications as well.
Subsequently, a liberal Catholic theologian’s take on rationality is presented here as such
an offering from the social sciences contributes to a bricolage of unintegrated pieces of
knowledge and discernments emerging from various disciplinary or social viewpoints on
reality. Vito Mancuso continues to focus on human rationality which, in his view, provides
humanity with the hope of eternal life or life from the perspective of eternity. Such a conviction
is in line with his horizontal understanding of human rationality, in addition to the human
being’s first challenge to understanding reality.
INTRADISCIPLINARY AND/OR INTERDISCIPLINARY IMPLICATIONS: The reason d’être of this article is
to call for a discussion partner to the notion of human rationality from the social sciences
(indicated as one of the neglected fields in the theology and science discourse). Vito
Mancuso, for one, brings the pragmatic and transformative (even revolutionary) dimension
to the table. A transversal approach to rationality must integrate such social practices
as well.
