Validation of bedaquiline phenotypic drug susceptibility testing methods and breakpoints : a multilaboratory, multicountry study

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kaniga, Koné
dc.contributor.author Aono, Akio
dc.contributor.author Borroni, Emanuele
dc.contributor.author Cirillo, Daniela Maria
dc.contributor.author Desmaretz, Christel
dc.contributor.author Hasan, Rumina
dc.contributor.author Joseph, Lavania
dc.contributor.author Mitarai, Satoshi
dc.contributor.author Shakoor, Sadia
dc.contributor.author Torrea, Gabriela
dc.contributor.author Ismail, Nazir Ahmed
dc.contributor.author Omar, Shaheed Vally
dc.date.accessioned 2021-08-03T10:58:30Z
dc.date.available 2021-08-03T10:58:30Z
dc.date.issued 2020-04
dc.description.abstract Drug-resistant tuberculosis persists as a major public health concern. Alongside efficacious treatments, validated and standardized drug susceptibility testing (DST) is required to improve patient care. This multicountry, multilaboratory external quality assessment (EQA) study aimed to validate the sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of provisional bedaquiline MIC breakpoints and World Health Organization interim critical concentrations (CCs) for categorizing clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates as susceptible/resistant to the drug. Three methods were used: Middlebrook 7H11 agar proportion (AP) assay, broth microdilution (BMD) assay, and mycobacterial growth indicator tube (MGIT) assay. Each of the five laboratories tested the 40-isolate (20 unique isolates, duplicated) EQA panel at three time points. The study validated the sensitivity and specificity of a bedaquiline MIC susceptibility breakpoint of 0.12 μg/ml for the BMD method and WHO interim CCs of 1 μg/ml for MGIT and 0.25 μg/ml for the 7H11 AP methods. Categorical agreements between observed and expected results and sensitivities/specificities for correctly identifying an isolate as susceptible/resistant were highest at the 0.25, 0.12, and 1 μg/ml bedaquiline concentrations for the AP method, BMD (frozen or dry plates), and MGIT960, respectively. At these concentrations, the very major error rates for erroneously categorizing an isolate as susceptible when it was resistant were the lowest and within CLSI guidelines. The most highly reproducible bedaquiline DST methods were MGIT960 and BMD using dry plates. These findings validate the use of standardized DST methodologies and interpretative criteria to facilitate routine phenotypic bedaquiline DST and to monitor the emergence of bedaquiline resistance. en_ZA
dc.description.department Medical Microbiology en_ZA
dc.description.librarian hj2021 en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorship Johnson & Johnson Global Public Health and Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. en_ZA
dc.description.uri https://journals.asm.org/journal/jcm en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Kaniga, K., Aono, A., Borroni, E., et al. 2020, 'Validation of bedaquiline phenotypic drug susceptibility testing methods and breakpoints : a multilaboratory, multicountry study', Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 58, no.4, art. e01677-19, pp. 1-10. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 0095-1137 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 1098-660X (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1128/JCM.01677-19
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/81103
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher American Society for Microbiology en_ZA
dc.rights © 2020 Kaniga et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. en_ZA
dc.subject Bedaquiline en_ZA
dc.subject Drug resistance en_ZA
dc.subject Variants en_ZA
dc.subject Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) en_ZA
dc.subject Tuberculosis (TB) en_ZA
dc.subject Drug susceptibility testing (DST) en_ZA
dc.subject External quality assessment (EQA) en_ZA
dc.title Validation of bedaquiline phenotypic drug susceptibility testing methods and breakpoints : a multilaboratory, multicountry study en_ZA
dc.type Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record