dc.contributor.author |
Ng’etich, Arthur K.S.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Voyi, K.V.V. (Kuku)
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Kirinyet, Ruth C.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Mutero, Clifford Maina
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2021-07-15T06:07:43Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2021-07-15T06:07:43Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2021-03 |
|
dc.description |
Supporting information : S1 Table. Excluded studies from systematic literature review. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248998.s001 |
en_ZA |
dc.description |
S2 Table. PRISMA checklist.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248998.s002 |
en_ZA |
dc.description |
S3 Table. Surveillance system functions.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248998.s003 |
en_ZA |
dc.description |
S4 Table. Summary of sub-themes with frequency and intensity effect sizes.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248998.s004 |
en_ZA |
dc.description |
S1 File. PROSPERO protocol.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248998.s005 |
en_ZA |
dc.description |
S2 File. PubMed search strategy.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248998.s006 |
en_ZA |
dc.description |
S3 File. Data extraction form.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248998.s007 |
en_ZA |
dc.description |
S4 File. Johns Hopkins nursing evidence-based practice appraisal tool.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248998.s008 |
en_ZA |
dc.description.abstract |
BACKGROUND : The revised integrated disease surveillance and response (IDSR) guidelines adopted by African member states in 2010 aimed at strengthening surveillance systems critical capacities. Milestones achieved through IDSR strategy implementation prior to adopting the revised guidelines are well documented; however, there is a dearth of knowledge on the progress made post-adoption. This study aimed to review key recommendations resulting from surveillance assessment studies to improve implementation of the revitalised IDSR system in the African region based on health workers’ perspectives. The review focused on literature published between 2010 and 2019 post-adopting the revised IDSR guidelines in the African region.
METHODS : A systematic literature search in PubMed, Web of Science and Cumulative Index for Nursing and Allied Health Literature was conducted. In addition, manual reference searches and grey literature searches using World Health Organisation Library and Information Networks for Knowledge databases were undertaken. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement checklist for systematic reviews was utilised for the review process.
RESULTS : Thirty assessment studies met the inclusion criteria. IDSR implementation under the revised guidelines could be improved considerably bearing in mind critical findings and recommendations emanating from the reviewed surveillance assessment studies. Key recommendations alluded to provision of laboratory facilities and improved specimen handling, provision of reporting forms and improved reporting quality, surveillance data accuracy and quality, improved knowledge and surveillance system performance, utilisation of up-to-date information and surveillance system strengthening, provision of resources, enhanced reporting timeliness and completeness, adopting alternative surveillance strategies and conducting further research to improve surveillance functions.
CONCLUSION : Recommendations on strengthening IDSR implementation in the African region post-adopting the revised guidelines mainly identify surveillance functions focused on reporting, feedback, training, supervision, timeliness and completeness of the surveillance system as aspects requiring policy refinement. |
en_ZA |
dc.description.department |
School of Health Systems and Public Health (SHSPH) |
en_ZA |
dc.description.department |
UP Centre for Sustainable Malaria Control (UP CSMC) |
en_ZA |
dc.description.librarian |
hj2021 |
en_ZA |
dc.description.uri |
http://www.plosone.org |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.citation |
Ng’etich AKS, Voyi K, Kirinyet RC, Mutero CM (2021) A systematic review on improving implementation of the revitalised integrated disease surveillance and response system in the African region: A health workers’ perspective. PLoS ONE 16(3): e0248998. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248998. |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.issn |
1932-6203 (online) |
|
dc.identifier.other |
10.1371/journal.pone.0248998 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/80837 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_ZA |
dc.publisher |
Public Library of Science |
en_ZA |
dc.rights |
© 2021 Ng’etich et al. This is an open
access article distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License. |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Integrated disease surveillance and response (IDSR) |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Surveillance assessment studies |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Implementation |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Revitalised IDSR system |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Healthcare workers (HCWs) |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
African region |
en_ZA |
dc.title |
A systematic review on improving implementation of the revitalised integrated disease surveillance and response system in the African region : a health workers' perspective |
en_ZA |
dc.type |
Postprint Article |
en_ZA |