Abstract:
Escherichia coli is a well known commensal inhabitant of the gastrointestinal tract of both humans
and animals and a highly diverse species. The physiology, biochemistry and genetics of E. coli
have been studied extensively over many decades. However, these studies have focussed
predominately on the pathogenic and commensal isolates. It has been described that E. coli
typically exists in two environments, the primary environment being the gastrointestinal tract of
the host and the secondary environment being that environment outside of the host (water, soil and
sediments). Upon introduction into the environment outside of the host, the numbers of E. coli
steadily decline. Generally, where E. coli is present in the external environment and where its
numbers are maintained it is due to a constant direct faecal input from the host. This short lifespan
in the environment outside of the host forms the basis for the use of E. coli as an indicator
organism for faecal contamination in water systems. In contrast, multiple studies have shown that some E. coli strains have the ability to survive and
persist in the external environment in the absence of faecal input from the host. With a large
pan-genome and the possibility of horizontal gene transfer (HGT) of desirable traits, E. coli have
the potential to adapt to a variety of different niches overcoming drastic changes in conditions in
its new environment. In addition, adaptation to the secondary environment is facilitated by the
presence of soils and sediments, where in an aquatic environment they provide a source of
nutrients and protection from the drastic change in conditions. Here, E. coli has the ability to
occupy a new niche and become naturalised within an aquatic environment. The aim of this masters project was to examine and characterise the diversity of E. coli isolates
collected from two South African freshwater environments namely, the Roodeplaat and Rietvlei
Dams, Pretoria. Specific research questions addressed in this study include: (1) are their unique
and genetically differentiated sub-populations within the aquatic environments sample? (2) Is
there a link between the unique sub-populations and their sample site? (3) Finally, what is the
relationship between sub-populations in terms of gene flow and population structure?
Understanding E. coli’s population structure and ecology may shed some light on its evolution and
potential to adapt to new environments.
Following phylogrouping, AFLP and phylogenetic analysis of the rpoS and uidA genes, the results
indicated that the population was highly diverse with the majority of strains grouping together
with the sewage isolates. Furthermore, population structure analyses concentrating on gene flow
and genetic differentiation revealed that possible environmental groups exist within the
population. In particular, two groups of E. coli isolates associated with aquatic plants showed restricted gene flow and definite genetic differentiation. These two groups can also be observed in
the rpoS and uidA phylogenetic analyses where they consistently group together in the absence of
sewage isolates.
These findings demonstrate that some E. coli are not only able to survive outside of their host but
have undergone some level of niche separation within the secondary environment. These results
raise important questions into the accuracy of using E. coli as an indicator organism. In the long
term, this study may aid in understanding the population dynamics of E. coli and the implications
of environmental strains on using E. coli in assessing water quality.