Abstract:
One of the major obstacles to human health relates to unsafe water and poor
sanitation. Faecal contamination of source and drinking water introduces enteric
pathogens which result in disease outbreaks. Therefore monitoring the occurrence of
human pathogens in source water and drinking water is necessary in order to limit the
prevalence of environmentally transmitted infectious diseases. Knowledge of
pathogen loads in source waters provides the basis for establishing treatment
requirements and health standards stipulated by water regulatory authorities and
assists in determining the efficacy of water treatment plants. Water quality
monitoring and public health assurance is performed routinely by enumerating faecal
indicator bacteria. Studies have demonstrated that there is no relationship between
current bacterial indicator detection and the presence of enteric pathogenic viruses in
treated and source water. There is therefore a need to monitor the levels of
pathogenic enteric viruses in surface waters, irrigation water, sewage effluent as well
as treated drinking water for public health safety and quality assessment. However
due to the low concentration of viruses in water matrices and presence of inhibitors,
efficient concentration methods from large quantities of water are essential.
The analysis of water for enteric viruses is a two stage process: the first step is to apply
efficient viral recovery and concentration procedures from large volumes (10–1000 ℓ)
of water followed by viral detection. Glass wool adsorption-elution is a cost-effective
and practical viral recovery method for use in resource-limiting settings. The main
objective of this study was to determine the efficiency of the glass wool adsorptionelution
method for the recovery of viruses of different genera from large water
samples (10 ℓ) of different quality by a step-by-step evaluation of its performance
using seeding experiments. Standard curves were prepared using quantitative reverse
transcription-polymerase chain reactions (RT-PCR)(for RNA viruses) and PCR (for DNA
viruses). The efficiency of recovery (EOR) of glass wool between tap water and turbid
surface water was compared for six enteric viruses by examining the recovery and loss
of viruses at each stage of the process. The generalised linear statistical model was
applied to compare the EOR of each virus in each water type and results clearly
indicated that the EOR varied for each virus type and was higher for tap water than for
turbid surface water for each virus. There was extensive loss of virus in the flow
through and this was also higher for the turbid water than the tap water. In this study
it was also demonstrated that mengovirus behaved similarly to the pathogenic enteric
viruses and was therefore a suitable process control to monitor viral recovery and
nucleic acid extraction when recovering and detecting enteric viruses from
environmental matrices using glass wool adsorption method. It was also demonstrated
that EOR of glass wool for turbid surface water was underestimated as the poor
sample quality affected the quantitative molecular detection assays. Adenovirus was
shown to be a suitable indicator for virus contamination of water. Modification of the
glass wool column preparation did not result in significant difference in EOR but an
increase in the amount of glass wool used resulted in reduction in EOR. There were no
significant differences between the two polyethylene glycol/sodium chloride
(PEG6000/NaCl and PEG8000/NaCl) precipitation methods applied to the secondary
concentration of the viruses, but it should be noted that the former has the
disadvantage of overnight incubation. The EOR of glass wool was shown to be
influenced by pH of the sample. The optimal sample pH for the recovery of hepatitis A
virus in turbid surface water was pH 6.0. The study provides valuable new data on the
EOR of enteric viruses using the glass wool adsorption-elution technique where virus
quantities could be traced from seeding to detection by molecular-based methods.