Digital proficiency is not a significant barrier for taking up hearing services with a hybrid online and face-to-face model

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ratanjee-Vanmali, Husmita
dc.contributor.author Swanepoel, De Wet
dc.contributor.author Laplante-Levesque, Ariane
dc.date.accessioned 2021-02-18T13:11:58Z
dc.date.available 2021-02-18T13:11:58Z
dc.date.issued 2020-12
dc.description.abstract PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of self-perceived digital proficiency on the uptake of hearing services through a hybrid online and face-to-face hearing health care model. METHOD: Adults were recruited via online methods to complete an online hearing screening test within the greater Durban area in South Africa. On submission of contact details after failing the screening, contact was made via telephone to assess readiness for further hearing care. If motivated and willing to continue, a face-to-face appointment for diagnostic hearing testing was confirmed, at which time an e-mail with an online mobile device and computer proficiency survey was sent. Hearing services were offered using combined online and face-to-face methods. RESULTS: Within 2 years (June 2017 to June 2019), 1,259 people from the target location submitted their details for the clinic audiologist to contact, of whom 931 participants (73.95%) failed the screening test. Of these participants, 5.69% (53/931, 57.41% men) attended a face-to-face diagnostic hearing evaluation. Mobile device and computer proficiency scores were not a predictor of acquiring hearing services. Age was the only significant predictor (p = .018) for those continuing with hearing care. Patients who continued with hearing care by acquiring hearing aids and support services were older (M = 73.63 years, SD = 11.62) and on average aware of their hearing loss for a longer time (M = 14.71 years, SD = 15.77), as compared to those who discontinued hearing health care who were younger (M = 59.21 years, SD = 14.42) and on average aware of their hearing loss for a shorter time (M = 6.37 years, SD = 9.26). CONCLUSIONS: Digital proficiency is not a predictor for acquiring hearing services through a hybrid online and face-to-face hearing care model. Hybrid services could allow professionals to assist patients in a combination of face-to-face and online services tailored to meet individual needs, including convenience and personalized care. en_ZA
dc.description.department Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology en_ZA
dc.description.librarian pm2021 en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorship The National Research Foundation of South Africa and the William Demant Foundation. en_ZA
dc.description.uri http://aja.pubs.asha.org en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Ratanjee-Vanmali, H., Swanepoel, D. & Laplante-Lévesqued, A. 2020, 'Digital proficiency is not a significant barrier for taking up hearing services with a hybrid online and face-to-face model', American Journal of Audiology, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 785-808. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 1059-0889 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 1558-9137 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1044/2020_AJA-19-00117
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/78759
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher American Speech-Language-Hearing Association en_ZA
dc.rights © 2020 The Authors. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. en_ZA
dc.subject Hearing aids en_ZA
dc.subject Hearing test en_ZA
dc.subject Barrier en_ZA
dc.subject Hybrid learning en_ZA
dc.subject Digital proficiency en_ZA
dc.subject Screening en_ZA
dc.title Digital proficiency is not a significant barrier for taking up hearing services with a hybrid online and face-to-face model en_ZA
dc.type Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record