Abstract:
Adjusting for baseline pre-intervention characteristics between treatment groups, through the use of propensity score matching methods, is an important step that enables researchers to do causal inference with confidence. This is critical, largely, due to the fact that practical treatment allocation scenarios are non-randomized in nature, with various inherent biases that are inevitable, and therefore requiring such experimental manipulations. These propensity score matching methods are the available tools to be used as control mechanisms, for such intrinsic system biases in causal studies, without the benefits of randomization (Lane, To, Kyna , & Robin, 2012). Certain assumptions need to be verifiable or met, before one may embark on a propensity score matching causal effects journey, using the Rubin causal model (Holland, 1986), of which the main ones are conditional independence (unconfoundedness) and common support (positivity). In particular, with this dissertation we are concerned with elaborating the applications of these matching methods, for a ‘strong-ignorability’ case (Rosenbaum & Rubin, 1983), i.e. when both the overlap and unconfoundedness properties are valid. We will take a journey from explaining different experimental designs and how the treatment effect is estimated, closing with a practical example based on two cohorts of enrolled introductory statistics students prior and post-clickers intervention, at a public South African university, and the relevant causal conclusions thereof.
Keywords: treatment, conditional independence, propensity score, counterfactual, confounder,
common support
