Court accommodations for persons with severe communication disabilities : a legal scoping review

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author White, Robyn May
dc.contributor.author Bornman, Juan
dc.contributor.author Johnson, Ensa
dc.contributor.author Msipa, Dianah
dc.date.accessioned 2020-12-04T05:45:37Z
dc.date.available 2020-12-04T05:45:37Z
dc.date.issued 2021-08
dc.description.abstract For persons with severe communication disabilities to be given access to justice, transformative equality and court accommodations should be made a global human rights priority as articulated in Article 13 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. However, these individuals, face significant barriers when attempting to access the court system. Currently, there are numerous concerns about what accommodations should be afforded these individuals to ensure transformative equality in court. The aim of the current legal scoping review was to identify the range of documented court accommodations internationally that will enable persons with severe communication disabilities to participate equally and without discrimination in court. As the research aim is placed at the nexus of social sciences and law, a rigorous new 5-step framework were developed. Search terms were entered into eight databases following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines in order to ensure a worldwide sample of data. From the included 54 publications, a total of 302 accommodations were identified. Using an inductive coding approach, these accommodations were categorized according to the four components of the procedural justice framework: 62% of the accommodations referred to the ‘Respect’ component; 27,40% referred to ‘Voice’; 19,47% to ‘Understanding’; and 15,51% to ‘Neutrality.’ Accommodations with the highest frequency count were the use of intermediaries, permitting augmentative and alternative communication, ensuring appropriate and proper questioning strategies, allowing frequent breaks, including CCTV in court, and using expert witnesses. en_ZA
dc.description.department Centre for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (CAAC) en_ZA
dc.description.department Centre for Human Rights en_ZA
dc.description.librarian hj2020 en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorship The National Institute for the Humanities and Social Sciences (NIHSS) and the South African Humanities Deans Association (SAHUDA). en_ZA
dc.description.uri http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/law/index.aspx en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation White, R., Bornman, J., Johnson, E. et al. 2021, 'Court accommodations for persons with severe communication disabilities: a legal scoping review', Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 27(3): 399-420, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/law0000289. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 1076-8971 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 1939-1528 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1037/law0000289
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/77257
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher American Psychological Association en_ZA
dc.rights © 2020 American Psychological Association en_ZA
dc.subject Accommodations en_ZA
dc.subject Court accommodation en_ZA
dc.subject Persons with severe communication disabilities en_ZA
dc.subject Law en_ZA
dc.subject Witness en_ZA
dc.subject Defendant en_ZA
dc.subject Procedural justice en_ZA
dc.title Court accommodations for persons with severe communication disabilities : a legal scoping review en_ZA
dc.type Postprint Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record