Genetic diversity targets and indicators in the CBD post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework must be improved
Hoban, Sean; Bruford, Michael; Jackson, Josephine D'Urban; Lopes-Fernandes, Margarida; Heuertz, Myriam; Hohenlohe, Paul A.; Paz-Vinas, Ivan; Sjögren-Gulve, Per; Segelbacher, Gernot; Vernesih, Cristiano; Aitkeni, Sally; Bertola, Laura D.; Bloomer, Paulette; Breed, Martin; Rodríguez-Correa, Hernando; Funk, W. Chris; Grueber, Catherine E.; Hunterp, Margaret E.; Jaffe, Rodolfo; Liggins, Libby; Mergeay, Joachim; Moharrek, Farideh; O'Brien, David; Ogden, Rob; Palma-Silva, Clarisse; Piersona, Jennifer; Ramakrishnan, Uma; Simo-Droissarta, Murielle; Tani, Naoki; Waits, Lisette; Laikre, Linda
Date:
2020-08
Abstract:
The 196 parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) will soon agree to a post-2020 global framework for
conserving the three elements of biodiversity (genetic, species, and ecosystem diversity) while ensuring sustainable
development and benefit sharing. As the most significant global conservation policy mechanism, the new CBD framework has far-reaching consequences- it will guide conservation actions and reporting for each member country
until 2050. In previous CBD strategies, as well as other major conservation policy mechanisms, targets and indicators
for genetic diversity (variation at the DNA level within species, which facilitates species adaptation and ecosystem
function) were undeveloped and focused on species of agricultural relevance. We assert that, to meet global conservation goals, genetic diversity within all species, not just domesticated species and their wild relatives, must be
conserved and monitored using appropriate metrics. Building on suggestions in a recent Letter in Science (Laikre et al.,
2020) we expand argumentation for three new, pragmatic genetic indicators and modifications to two current indicators for maintaining genetic diversity and adaptive capacity of all species, and provide guidance on their practical
use. The indicators are: 1) the number of populations with effective population size above versus below 500, 2) the
proportion of populations maintained within species, 3) the number of species and populations in which genetic
diversity is monitored using DNA-based methods. We also present and discuss Goals and Action Targets for post-2020
biodiversity conservation which are connected to these indicators and underlying data. These pragmatic indicators
and goals have utility beyond the CBD; they should benefit conservation and monitoring of genetic diversity via
national and global policy for decades to come.
Description:
Supplementary material: Tables S1 and S2 and Fig. S1 compile estimates of Ne/Nc from several reviews and new data.