dc.contributor.author |
Pike, Meghan
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Biagio-de Jager, Leigh
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Le Roux, Talita
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Hofmeyr, Louis Murray
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2020-10-07T08:54:27Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2020-10-07T08:54:27Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2020-04-28 |
|
dc.description |
The dataset generated for this study is available on
the University of Pretoria Research Data Repository
(doi: 10.25403/UPresearchdata.11819589). Please note that
the dataset is confidential and requests to access the dataset will
be considered on a case by case basis. |
en_ZA |
dc.description.abstract |
BACKGROUND : Late latency auditory evoked potentials (LLAEPs) provide objective
evidence of an individual’s central auditory processing abilities. Electrically evoked cortical
auditory evoked potentials (eCAEPs) are a type of LLAEP that provides an objective
measure of aided speech perception and auditory processing abilities in cochlear implant
(CI) recipients.
AIM : To determine the short-term test-retest reliability of eCAEPs in adult CI recipients.
DESIGN : An explorative, within-subject repeated measures research design
was employed.
STUDY SAMPLE : The study sample included 12 post-lingually deafened, unilaterally
implanted adult CI recipients with at least 9 months of CI experience.
METHOD : eCAEPs representing basal, medial and apical cochlear regions were recorded
in the implanted ears of each participant. Measurements were repeated 7 days after the
initial assessment.
RESULTS : No significant differences between either median latencies or amplitudes at
test and retest sessions (p > 0.05) were found when results for apical, medial and
basal electrodes were averaged together. Mean intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)
scores averaged across basal, medial and apical cochlear stimulus regions indicated that
both consistency and agreement were statistically significant and ranged from moderate
to good (ICC = 0.58–0.86, p < 0.05). ICC confidence intervals did demonstrate
considerable individual variability in both latency and amplitudes.
CONCLUSION : eCAEP latencies and amplitudes demonstrated moderate to good
short-term test-retest reliability. However, confidence intervals indicated individual variability in measurement consistency which is likely linked to attention and listening effort required from the CI recipients. |
en_ZA |
dc.description.department |
Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology |
en_ZA |
dc.description.librarian |
am2020 |
en_ZA |
dc.description.uri |
http://www.frontiersin.org/Neurology |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.citation |
Pike M, Biagio-de Jager L, le Roux T
and Hofmeyr LM (2020) Short-Term
Test-Retest Reliability of Electrically
Evoked Cortical Auditory Potentials in
Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Frontiers in Neurology 11:305.
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00305 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.issn |
1664-2295 (online) |
|
dc.identifier.other |
10.3389/fneur.2020.00305 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/76378 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_ZA |
dc.publisher |
Frontiers Media |
en_ZA |
dc.rights |
© 2020 Pike, Biagio-de Jager, le Roux and Hofmeyr. This is an open-access
article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC
BY). |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Cochlear implant |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Test-retest reliability |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Cortical auditory evoked potentials |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Electrical evoked responses |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Aided |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Late latency auditory evoked potential (LLAEP) |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Auditory processing ability |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Evoked cortical auditory evoked potential (eCAEP) |
en_ZA |
dc.title |
Short-term test-retest reliability of electrically evoked cortical auditory potentials in adult cochlear implant recipients |
en_ZA |
dc.type |
Article |
en_ZA |