Abstract:
Current diatom assessments of shallow lakes typically use littoral epiphytic diatoms as bioindicators for eutrophication pressure. However, challenges in establishing robust ecological assessments still exist because of the natural pressures that shallow lakes are subjected to which are difficult to quantify (e.g., water-level fluctuations or wave action). Information on the spatial and temporal variability of epiphytic communities within a shallow lake is limited although important for the development of robust bioassessment protocols. We compared epiphytic diatom taxa and functional group compositions between the littoral and pelagic zone of three least-disturbed shallow lakes in the northeastern part of South Africa along a temporal gradient. In comparison to the pelagic zone, the littoral zone was characterized by almost double in species richness. Temporal variability was significantly higher for littoral diatom communities and littoral water physico-chemistry than those of the pelagic. Overall, water depth was a good predictor of the epiphytic diatom taxa and functional group composition. We also found that pelagic diatom taxa and functional groups correlated better with pelagic physico-chemistry than littoral diatoms to littoral physico-chemistry. This could be attributed to un-modeled factors related to natural physical pressures that will have more of an impact on littoral habitats than less exposed pelagic habitats. Given these findings, using pelagic epiphytic diatoms as a bioindicator in shallow lake monitoring programs could be more efficient than littoral diatoms at providing robust ecological assessments due to their relatively low variability.
