dc.contributor.author |
Akyol, Mehmet Umut
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Alden, Tord D.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Amartino, Hernan
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Ashworth, Jane
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Belani, Kumar
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Berger, Kenneth I.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Borgo, Andrea
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Braunlin, Elizabeth
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Eto, Yoshikatsu
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Gold, Jeffrey I.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Jester, Andrea
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Jones, Simon A.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Karsli, Cengiz
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Mackenzie, William
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Marinho, Diane Ruschel
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
McFadyen, Andrew
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
McGill, Jim
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Mitchell, John J.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Muenzer, Joseph
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Okuyama, Torayuki
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Orchard, Paul J.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Stevens, Bob
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Thomas, Sophie
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Walker, Robert
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Wynn, Robert
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Giugliani, Roberto
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Harmatz, Paul
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Hendriksz, Christian J.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Scarpa, Maurizio
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2020-08-18T06:09:41Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2020-08-18T06:09:41Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2019-06 |
|
dc.description |
Additional file 1: Methodology: Further information regarding methodology, including: defining clinical questions using the P.I.C.O methodology, the search strategy recording form, results of the systematic literature review according to PRISMA, the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine criteria and the AGREE II evaluation. |
|
dc.description |
Additional file 2: Oxford CEBM grading for MPS IVA: Tables detailing the evidence levels given to each reference supporting the MPS IVA guidance statements and the Evidence Grades applied to each guidance statement. Evidence levels were assessed using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine and were based on the quality of evidence of each reference. For each guidance statement, an overall Evidence Grade was applied, based on the evidence levels of the supporting references. |
|
dc.description |
Additional file 3: Oxford CEBM grading for MPS VI: Tables detailing the evidence levels given to each reference supporting the MPS VI guidance statements and the Evidence Grades applied to each guidance statement. Evidence levels were assessed using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine and were based on the quality of evidence of each reference. For each guidance statement, an overall Evidence Grade was applied, based on the evidence levels of the supporting references. |
|
dc.description |
Additional file 4: Modified-Delphi voting Round 1: Full results of the first round of the modified-Delphi voting, which was used to demonstrate consensus of the guidance statements. |
|
dc.description |
Additional file 5: Modified-Delphi voting Round 2: Full results of the second round of the modified-Delphi voting, which was used to demonstrate consensus of the guidance statements. |
|
dc.description.abstract |
INTRODUCTION: Mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) IVA or Morquio A syndrome is an autosomal recessive lysosomal storage
disorder (LSD) caused by deficiency of the N-acetylgalactosamine-6-sulfatase (GALNS) enzyme, which impairs lysosomal
degradation of keratan sulphate and chondroitin-6-sulphate. The multiple clinical manifestations of MPS IVA present
numerous challenges for management and necessitate the need for individualised treatment. Although treatment
guidelines are available, the methodology used to develop this guidance has come under increased scrutiny. This
programme was conducted to provide evidence-based, expert-agreed recommendations to optimise management of
MPS IVA.
METHODS: Twenty six international healthcare professionals across multiple disciplines, with expertise in managing MPS
IVA, and three patient advocates formed the Steering Committee (SC) and contributed to the development of this
guidance. Representatives from six Patient Advocacy Groups (PAGs) were interviewed to gain insights on patient
perspectives. A modified-Delphi methodology was used to demonstrate consensus among a wider group of
healthcare professionals with experience managing patients with MPS IVA and the manuscript was evaluated against
the validated Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument by three independent
reviewers.
RESULTS: A total of 87 guidance statements were developed covering five domains: (1) general management principles;
(2) recommended routine monitoring and assessments; (3) disease-modifying interventions (enzyme replacement
therapy [ERT] and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation [HSCT]); (4) interventions to support respiratory and sleep
disorders; (5) anaesthetics and surgical interventions (including spinal, limb, ophthalmic, cardio-thoracic and ear-nosethroat [ENT] surgeries). Consensus was reached on all statements after two rounds of voting. The overall guideline
AGREE II assessment score obtained for the development of the guidance was 5.3/7 (where 1 represents the lowest
quality and 7 represents the highest quality of guidance).
CONCLUSION: This manuscript provides evidence- and consensus-based recommendations for the management of
patients with MPS IVA and is for use by healthcare professionals that manage the holistic care of patients with the
intention to improve clinical- and patient-reported outcomes and enhance patient quality of life. It is recognised that
the guidance provided represents a point in time and further research is required to address current knowledge and
evidence gaps. |
en_ZA |
dc.description.department |
Paediatrics and Child Health |
en_ZA |
dc.description.librarian |
pm2020 |
en_ZA |
dc.description.sponsorship |
BioMarin |
en_ZA |
dc.description.uri |
https://ojrd.biomedcentral.com |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.citation |
Akyol, M.U., Alden, T.D., Amartino, H. et al. Recommendations for the management of MPS IVA: systematic evidence- and consensus-based guidance. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 14, 137 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-019-1074-9. |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.issn |
1750-1172 (online) |
|
dc.identifier.other |
10.1186/s13023-019-1074-9 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/75777 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_ZA |
dc.publisher |
BioMed Central (BMC) |
en_ZA |
dc.rights |
© The Author(s)2019. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Morquio a syndrome |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Management guidelines |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Elosulfase alfa |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Enzyme replacement therapy |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Surgery |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Anaesthetics |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Lysosomal storage disorder (LSD) |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
N-acetylgalactosamine-6-sulfatase (GALNS) |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Morquio A syndrome (MPS IVA) |
en_ZA |
dc.title |
Recommendations for the management of MPS IVA : systematic evidence- and consensus-based guidance |
en_ZA |
dc.type |
Article |
en_ZA |