Contrasting the effect of forest landscape condition to the resilience of species diversity in a human modified landscape : implications for the conservation of tee species

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Araia, Mulugheta Ghebreslassie
dc.contributor.author Chirwa, Paxie W.
dc.contributor.author Pelagie Assede, Emeline Sessi
dc.date.accessioned 2020-04-10T08:01:11Z
dc.date.available 2020-04-10T08:01:11Z
dc.date.issued 2020-01
dc.description.abstract Using landscape moderation insurance and Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis (IDH) as frameworks, this study assessed the response of local assemblage among different land use regimes (mean β-diversity), using the Jaccard dissimilarity matrix in contrasting Human Modified Forest Landscapes (HMFLs). The study was conducted at the relatively simplified Mafhela Forest Reserve and the complex Thathe Vondo Forest Reserve in South Africa. The patterns of overall β-diversity between HMFL and State-protected Indigenous Forests (SIF) were compared and the leading change drivers were then untangled. This study found that human disturbance affects mean β-diversity of local assemblages among land use regimes between the two HMFLs in an ecologically contrasting manner. The HMFL in Mafhela Forest Reserve had distinct local assemblages among land use regimes and did not conform to the expectation of IDH. On average, HMFL had the same average local species richness as SIF, mainly due to change in species composition (species replacement) induced by land use disturbance. Land use intensity gradient was the leading change driver to explain the overall β-diversity of the Mafhela Forest Reserve. The findings in the Thathe Vondo Forest Reserve were in contrast with the Mafhela Forest Reserve. Although on average the HMFL had the same local species richness as SIFs, this was mainly due to a trade-off of species gain in trees along the rivers and streams and species loss in Culturally Protected Areas (sacred forests) (CPA) as expected by IDH. The contrasting findings imply that the effectiveness of any alternative conservation strategy is context-dependent. The resilience of local assemblages and conservation value of HMFL depends on the condition of the overall forest landscape complexity and cannnot be captured by one theory, nor by one species diversity matrix (e.g., β-diversity or Richness). It thus demands the application of complementary theoretical frameworks and multilevel modeling. en_ZA
dc.description.department Plant Production and Soil Science en_ZA
dc.description.librarian am2020 en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorship The Forest Programme at the University of Pretoria in South Africa through the South African Forest Company Limited (SAFCOL) Forest Chair. en_ZA
dc.description.uri https://www.mdpi.com/journal/land en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Araia et al. 2020 'Contrasting the effect of forest landscape condition to the resilience of species diversity in a human modified landscape : implications for the conservation of tee species', Land, vol. 9, art. 4, pp. 1-19. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 2073-445X (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.3390/land9010004
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/74117
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher MDPI en_ZA
dc.rights © 2019 by the authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. en_ZA
dc.subject Land use intensity gradient en_ZA
dc.subject Species richness; species replacement en_ZA
dc.subject Landscape moderation insurance en_ZA
dc.subject Intermediate disturbance hypothesis (IDH) en_ZA
dc.subject Beta (β)-diversity en_ZA
dc.subject Human modified forest landscape (HMFL) en_ZA
dc.title Contrasting the effect of forest landscape condition to the resilience of species diversity in a human modified landscape : implications for the conservation of tee species en_ZA
dc.type Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record