dc.contributor.author |
Hohmann, Erik
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Myburgh, Jolandie
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Keough, Natalie
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Tetsworth, Kevin
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Glatt, Vaida
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2019-11-15T10:46:29Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2019-10 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
BACKGROUND : The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and reproducibility of three commonly used radiographic measures for plantar surface angles.
METHODS : The calcaneal angle (CA), calcaneal pitch angle (CPA), and length-height index (LHI) was measured by three independent examiners on two occasions on lateral foot radiographs. Intra- and inter-rater correlations were calculated using a general linear estimate model and post-hoc tests for repeated measures. Bland–Altman’s plots with limits of agreement were used for observer differences in scores.
RESULTS : The intra-class correlations for the CA ranged from 0.91 to 0.94, for the CPA from 0.93 to 0.98, and for the LHI from 0.96 to 0.97. The inter-class correlations were 0.80 for CA, 0.83 for CPA and 0.93 for LHI.
CONCLUSIONS : The results of this study strongly suggest that the length-height index was the most consistent and reliable measure for arch height.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE : Diagnostic Level II, validity. |
en_ZA |
dc.description.department |
Anatomy |
en_ZA |
dc.description.embargo |
2020-10-01 |
|
dc.description.librarian |
hj2019 |
en_ZA |
dc.description.uri |
http://www.elsevier.com/locate/fas |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.citation |
Hohmann, E., Myburgh, J., Keough, N. et al. 2019, 'Inter- and intraclass correlations for three standard foot radiographic measurements for plantar surface angles. Which measure is most reliable?', Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 646-653. |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.issn |
1268-7731 (print) |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
1460-958 (online) |
|
dc.identifier.other |
10.1016/j.fas.2018.07.007 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/72321 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_ZA |
dc.publisher |
Elsevier |
en_ZA |
dc.rights |
© 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Foot and Ankle Society. Notice : this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Foot and Ankle Surgery. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. A definitive version was subsequently published in Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 646-653, 2019. doi : 10.1016/j.fas.2018.07.007. |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Arch height |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Radiological arch measures |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Motion |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Flatfoot |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Alignment |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Validity |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Agreement |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Reliability |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Foot posture index |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Length-height index (LHI) |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Calcaneal angle (CA) |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Calcaneal pitch angle (CPA) |
en_ZA |
dc.subject.other |
Health sciences articles SDG-03 |
|
dc.subject.other |
SDG-03: Good health and well-being |
|
dc.title |
Inter- and intraclass correlations for three standard foot radiographic measurements for plantar surface angles. Which measure is most reliable? |
en_ZA |
dc.type |
Postprint Article |
en_ZA |