Abstract:
Crush pillars have been extensively applied on the Merensky Reef horizon
since the late 1970s. Once in a crushed state, the residual strength of the
pillar provides a local support function and must support the hangingwall
to the height of the highest known parting. The design of crush pillars is
mainly limited to specifying a width to height ratio (w:h) of approximately
2:1. It is also required that a pillar crushes close to the face, while the pillar
is being formed. On many mines the crush pillar system is problematic
owing to the difficulty of controlling pillar sizes. This is mainly caused by
poor drilling and blasting practices. As a result, pillar crushing is not
always achieved. Crush pillars are implemented at relatively shallow
depth, the pillar dimensions have remained essentially unchanged over
many years, and the impact of regional pillars and geological losses
contributing to the regional behaviour of the rock mass are overlooked. In
many cases the pillar system is the source of seismicity. In this paper, the
influence of mining losses (potholes) and the use of sidings are discussed
as possible contributors impacting on crush pillar behaviour. A limit
equilibrium model implemented in a displacement discontinuity boundary
element program is used to demonstrate crush pillar behaviour. The results
are compared to the pillar behaviour at an underground investigation site,
which supports the preliminary findings.
Description:
This paper
was first presented at the AfriRock 2017
International Symposium, 30 September –6
October 2017, Cape Town Convention Centre,
Cape Town.
Part of the work described in this paper formed part of
Dr Michael du Plessis’ PhD studies at the University of
Pretoria. (http://hdl.handle.net/2263/58270)