Democratization of ecosystem services—a radical approach for assessing nature’s benefits in the face of urbanization

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author McHale, Melissa R.
dc.contributor.author Beck, Scott M.
dc.contributor.author Pickett, Steward T.A.
dc.contributor.author Childers, Daniel L.
dc.contributor.author Cadenasso, Mary L.
dc.contributor.author Rivers III, Louie
dc.contributor.author Swemmer, Louise
dc.contributor.author Ebersohn, L. (Liesel)
dc.contributor.author Twine, Wayne
dc.contributor.author Bunn, David N.
dc.date.accessioned 2019-10-10T07:01:19Z
dc.date.available 2019-10-10T07:01:19Z
dc.date.issued 2018-07-18
dc.description.abstract OBJECTIVES : (1) To evaluate how ecosystem services may be utilized to either reinforce or fracture the planning and development practices that emerged from segregation and economic exclusion; (2) To survey the current state of ecosystem service assessments and synthesize a growing number of recommendations from the literature for renovating ecosystem service analyses. METHODS : Utilizing current maps of ecosystem service distribution in Bushbuckridge Local Municipality, South Africa, we considered how a democratized process of assessing ecosystem services will produce a more nuanced representation of diverse values in society and capture heterogeneity in ecosystem structure and function. RESULTS : We propose interventions for assessing ecosystem services that are inclusive of a broad range of stakeholders’ values and result in actual quantification of social and ecological processes. We demonstrate how to operationalize a pluralistic framework for ecosystem service assessments. CONCLUSION : A democratized approach to ecosystem service assessments is a reimagined path to rescuing a poorly implemented concept and designing and managing future socialecological systems that benefit people and support ecosystem integrity. It is the responsibility of scientists who do ecosystem services research to embrace more complex, pluralistic frameworks so that sound and inclusive scientific information is utilized in decision-making. en_ZA
dc.description.department Educational Psychology en_ZA
dc.description.librarian am2019 en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorship The National Science Foundation under Grant No. RCN 1140070. en_ZA
dc.description.uri https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tehs20 en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Melissa R. McHale, Scott M. Beck, Steward T. A. Pickett, Daniel L. Childers, Mary L. Cadenasso, Louie Rivers III, Louise Swemmer, Liesel Ebersohn, Wayne Twine & David N Bunn (2018) Democratization of ecosystem services—a radical approach for assessing nature’s benefits in the face of urbanization, Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 4:5, 115-131, DOI: 10.1080/20964129.2018.1480905. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 2096-4129 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 2332-8878 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1080/20964129.2018.1480905
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/71777
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher Taylor and Francis en_ZA
dc.rights © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group on behalf of the Ecological Society of China. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). en_ZA
dc.subject Ecosystem services en_ZA
dc.subject Socialecological systems en_ZA
dc.subject Heterogeneity en_ZA
dc.subject Landcover en_ZA
dc.subject Pluralistic en_ZA
dc.subject Deliberative en_ZA
dc.title Democratization of ecosystem services—a radical approach for assessing nature’s benefits in the face of urbanization en_ZA
dc.type Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record