Is pelvic floor morphology a predictor of successful pessary retention? Original research and review of the literature

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Paterson, Frances
dc.contributor.author Abdool, Zeelha
dc.date.accessioned 2019-07-17T09:27:29Z
dc.date.available 2019-07-17T09:27:29Z
dc.date.issued 2018
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND : Vaginal pessaries are known to be an effective treatment modality for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Pessaries form an important part of the physician’s armamentarium in the treatment of POP, but currently many of the factors affecting their successful use are poorly understood. OBJECTIVES : To determine the association between pessary retention (PR) at 1 year, and functional pelvic floor morphology, i.e. levator hiatal distance and area, and levator avulsion. METHODS : This retrospective study reviewed the records of 73 patients with symptomatic POP at a tertiary urogynaecological centre. This multi-ethnic cohort had previously been studied for pelvic-floor morphology, had had 4D transperineal pelvic-floor ultrasound, and had opted for a vaginal pessary as a treatment option. RESULTS : Our population had a mean age of 59.4 (range 32 - 91) years, and mean body mass index of 29.4 (range 20 - 42) kg/m2, with a mean assessment of stage 3 in the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantifications System (POP-Q). The level of prolapse was found to be related to PR (p=0.077). We further explored this concept using symmetric measures of association (γ=–0.353), indicating that PR decreases with increasing prolapse severity. PR was also found to be inversely associated with prior pelvic reconstructive surgery (n=63; p=0.055; γ=–0.417). There was a strong correlation that failed, however, to achieve significance by a small margin (p=0.052) between hiatal distance on contraction and PR. CONCLUSION : This study found an inverse relationship between PR and hiatal distance on contraction, prior pelvic surgery and the severity of prolapse. This was a pilot study with a limited number of participants, and the authors plan a prospective study to further clarify the association between long-term PR and functional pelvic floor morphology. en_ZA
dc.description.department Obstetrics and Gynaecology en_ZA
dc.description.librarian am2019 en_ZA
dc.description.uri http://sajog.org.za/index.php/SAJOG en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Paterson, F.S. & Abdool, Z. 2018, 'Is pelvic floor morphology a predictor of successful pessary retention? Original research and review of the literature', South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1-5. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 0038-2329 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 2078-5135 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.7196/SAJOG.2018.v24i3.1360
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/70746
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher Health and Medical Publishing Group en_ZA
dc.rights © 2019, South African Medical Association. All rights reserved. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial Works License (CC BY-NC 4.0) . en_ZA
dc.subject Vaginal pessaries en_ZA
dc.subject Treatment en_ZA
dc.subject Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) en_ZA
dc.subject Pessary retention (PR) en_ZA
dc.subject Levator avulsion en_ZA
dc.subject Pelvic floor morphology en_ZA
dc.title Is pelvic floor morphology a predictor of successful pessary retention? Original research and review of the literature en_ZA
dc.type Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record